Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!
View Poll Results: Which one would u choose.
04-05 Subaru STI
45.65%
93-98 Supra
50.00%
Van + SRT4 = VIPER UTI OWNZ U!!!!
4.35%
Voters: 46. You may not vote on this poll

STI Or Supra

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2004, 07:17 AM
  #21  
amp
Super Moderator
 
amp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 3,928
Default

Originally Posted by RXecret7' date='Jun 20 2004, 09:28 PM
..He's kind've confused, He's owned an FD, but had to sell it a while back...
id suggest another fd..
amp is offline  
Old 06-21-2004, 09:29 AM
  #22  
Super Moderator
 
Baldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 5,425
Default

If I had trouble deciding between a new car and an older one, I'd choose the new one, for the warranty, and you don't have to worry about what the previous owner did, or what they're lying about.
Baldy is offline  
Old 06-21-2004, 09:41 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
PhoenixDownVII's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Orange County, NY
Posts: 635
Default

Originally Posted by 1gendreemer' date='Jun 21 2004, 07:40 AM
I'd go STI...it's something a little different. Sure Supras are awesome cars too, but there's getting to be a lot of them on the road. I'm sold on AWD too...there's nothin quite like spinnin all four!
"Getting to be a lot of them on the road"?! LOL, is toyota secretly making more of them?



They are and will always be more rare than a STI, just look at production numbers.



And brandon:



LOL Did you see top gears review of the rx8? "The problem here is that it seems like the executives at mazda didn't know what they wanted to make! Is it a sports car? Is it a passenger car/sedan?!"



Rx8 is a sports coupe I think, or sports sedan. If you go to a consumer guide (auto.consumerguide.com) you'll see the tag for the Supra being "Sports Car" and the WRX as a "Subcompact Car" or something. I think they say "Sports Car" for rx8 so you win that one :P
PhoenixDownVII is offline  
Old 06-21-2004, 10:13 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Erik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New Jersey YO!
Posts: 458
Default

You'd be hard pressed to find a nice supra for under 25K. And one with low mileage would be at least 30K. I mean for a used car thats A LOT. And are you very apprehensive about buying something used...not "truly" knowing the past history of it?



On the other hand the Scooby isn't as pretty...not as moddable (yet)...but like someone else said has about the same stock performance, can be had brand new, fits 4 people, and handles nicely. They key is that it is brand new...you decide the fate for it



RWD is definitely more fun...but how often will you be doing burnouts, donuts, drifts? On a daily basis? If so then go with something rwd.
Erik is offline  
Old 06-21-2004, 10:20 AM
  #25  
Super Moderator

 
banzaitoyota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: My BIG ol TURBO-DIESEL
Posts: 5,181
Default

Mitsu is not honring the warrenties on Evo's right now if you Autocrossed them
banzaitoyota is offline  
Old 06-21-2004, 10:42 AM
  #26  
Member
 
Boost Addict's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: chi-town well kinda
Posts: 87
Default

Well there ain't not action without traction baby!
Boost Addict is offline  
Old 06-21-2004, 01:06 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
inanimate_object's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 907
Default

Unless it's wet or you are going off road, AWD is a disadvantage, and despite the Supra's apparent drag shortcomings, it will blow the socks off a Subaru on any track with corners.



Mark
inanimate_object is offline  
Old 06-21-2004, 01:16 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
Midnightdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Reno,NV
Posts: 1,081
Default

that was a hard choice...I love subies supras rx-7's I own a subie and a 7 & have had a supra...the thing that pushed me twords supra is the amount of power they can make on the stock block. and they still look great for an 11 year old body style...same with the RX-7
Midnightdriver is offline  
Old 06-21-2004, 02:04 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
rdavidsrx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Thine Ginsu!
Posts: 101
Default

If he is looking at a supra because of the engine and it's capabilities, shouldn't he consider the lexus sc300 from around '94. Didn't they have the same engine as the supras, just not turbo, thus making it very capable of handling a turbo, with a little aftermarket ecu magic.

Also I know I have seen tyhem going for like 12K with moderate mileage which allows a hefty budget for some initial mods....like the turbo, fuel system, and ecu to make it as fast if not faster than the STI.



Oh but I vote Supra otherwise.
rdavidsrx7 is offline  
Old 06-21-2004, 02:39 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Srce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,547
Default

I don't know, the Supra's WAY TOO overpriced for what you get. The STi doesn't pack enough heat for the price tag (bullshit LOL), and since I love the SRT-4, that's what I'm gonna go with. Plus, Van's are phat yo.
Srce is offline  


Quick Reply: STI Or Supra



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09 PM.