Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

For Srce And Other Zonda Fans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 03:50 PM
  #11  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,763
From: Savannah, Ga
Default

Originally Posted by inanimate_object' date='Jan 7 2005, 04:10 PM
Are you sure it's not power you're talking about? What size is the engine? 6.0litres?



Mark





The new MB V12's are twin turbo, and yes, those numbers are right(for the AMG variant, at least)
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 04:33 PM
  #12  
75 Repu's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,848
From: Mike is a Liar!
Default

meh.
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 04:41 PM
  #13  
defprun's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,016
From: St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Default

i like it!
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 04:43 PM
  #14  
inanimate_object's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 907
From: Ireland
Default

Ok so you're talking about the engines in mercedes which have forced induction - because you can't change torque output on a naturally aspirated engine like that.



Mark
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 04:59 PM
  #15  
defprun's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,016
From: St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Default

You know you can detune Naturally Aspirated engines. It's called heads that flow air poorly compared to the tuned ones and less compression. Along with ECU's that dont allow enough fuel/air, throttle bodies that arent as big, restrictive exhaust systems, smaller fuel pumps, smaller injectors, A/C, power steering, big stereo systems and neon.
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 05:26 PM
  #16  
inanimate_object's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 907
From: Ireland
Default

Originally Posted by defprun' date='Jan 7 2005, 11:58 PM
You know you can detune Naturally Aspirated engines. It's called heads that flow air poorly compared to the tuned ones and less compression. Along with ECU's that dont allow enough fuel/air, throttle bodies that arent as big, restrictive exhaust systems, smaller fuel pumps, smaller injectors, A/C, power steering, big stereo systems and neon.

Yeah but it's very hard to change the amount of peak torque in an engine - just see if you can find a n/a engine that doesn't produce around 70lbft/litre.



Mark
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 05:29 PM
  #17  
defprun's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,016
From: St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Default

with them new engines you could hook the comp up to a computer and **** it all up and such.
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 07:35 PM
  #18  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,763
From: Savannah, Ga
Default

2001 Bmw M3. 262 ft lbs from a 3.2l, 82 ft lbs/l
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 03:50 AM
  #19  
75 Repu's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,848
From: Mike is a Liar!
Default

hmmmm.. what ever happened to the koeniggseig.. ?
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 05:17 AM
  #20  
inanimate_object's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 907
From: Ireland
Default

Originally Posted by mazdaspeed7' date='Jan 8 2005, 02:34 AM
2001 Bmw M3. 262 ft lbs from a 3.2l, 82 ft lbs/l

OK fair enough - but that BMW engine isn't far off a race engine and has German precision engineering on its side. Regardless it's not a million miles from 70lb ft/litre and certainly not the difference between "over 1000ft/lbs" and "738".



Mark



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:59 PM.