Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

For Srce And Other Zonda Fans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-07-2005, 06:04 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
inanimate_object's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 907
Default

up to 620bhp from 555, 50kg lighter = over 500bhp/tonne. Full article: http://www.autocar.co.uk/news_article.asp?na_id=212946



Mark
inanimate_object is offline  
Old 01-07-2005, 09:34 AM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
Klar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3
Default

Nice.
Klar is offline  
Old 01-07-2005, 01:11 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
FikseRxSeven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: union, new jersey
Posts: 8,079
Default

i saw an article about this car in car and driver magazine, and it says that they are detuning an engine that can produce 885lbs of torque down to 627lbs because they start to lose traction at 553lbs... go figure
FikseRxSeven is offline  
Old 01-07-2005, 01:43 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
93 R1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,867
Default

If its using the same motor as the old one that is the old old AMG v12. They should use the new one thats in the SL65 and CL65. 604hp 738ft/lbs twin turbo
93 R1 is offline  
Old 01-07-2005, 01:52 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
inanimate_object's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 907
Default

Originally Posted by FikseRxSeven' date='Jan 7 2005, 08:11 PM
i saw an article about this car in car and driver magazine, and it says that they are detuning an engine that can produce 885lbs of torque down to 627lbs because they start to lose traction at 553lbs... go figure

Sounds dodgy to me, AFAIK it is an AMG v12 and they were naturally aspitated so it would be impossible to change the torque by such a large margin.



Mark
inanimate_object is offline  
Old 01-07-2005, 02:01 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
93 R1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,867
Default

Originally Posted by inanimate_object' date='Jan 7 2005, 03:52 PM
Sounds dodgy to me, AFAIK it is an AMG v12 and they were naturally aspitated so it would be impossible to change the torque by such a large margin.



Mark



The new v12 was "detuned" from over 1000ft/lbs to 738 because they couldn't keep a gearbox behind it.
93 R1 is offline  
Old 01-07-2005, 02:09 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Srce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,547
Default

Don't like the extra headlight.
Srce is offline  
Old 01-07-2005, 02:11 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
inanimate_object's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 907
Default

Originally Posted by 93 R1' date='Jan 7 2005, 09:01 PM
The new v12 was "detuned" from over 1000ft/lbs to 738 because they couldn't keep a gearbox behind it.

Are you sure it's not power you're talking about? What size is the engine? 6.0litres?



Mark
inanimate_object is offline  
Old 01-07-2005, 03:24 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Eyxom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Port St. Lucie, FL
Posts: 638
Default

SPOOOOGE!!!
Eyxom is offline  
Old 01-07-2005, 03:36 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
FikseRxSeven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: union, new jersey
Posts: 8,079
Default

Originally Posted by inanimate_object' date='Jan 7 2005, 02:52 PM
Sounds dodgy to me, AFAIK it is an AMG v12 and they were naturally aspitated so it would be impossible to change the torque by such a large margin.



Mark





maybe... i quoted the exact numbers from the magazine in front of me
FikseRxSeven is offline  


Quick Reply: For Srce And Other Zonda Fans



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 AM.