NoPistons -Mazda Rx7 & Rx8 Rotary Forum

NoPistons -Mazda Rx7 & Rx8 Rotary Forum (https://www.nopistons.com/)
-   Insert BS here (https://www.nopistons.com/insert-bs-here-12/)
-   -   For Srce And Other Zonda Fans (https://www.nopistons.com/insert-bs-here-12/srce-other-zonda-fans-42766/)

mazdaspeed7 01-07-2005 03:50 PM


Originally Posted by inanimate_object' date='Jan 7 2005, 04:10 PM
Are you sure it's not power you're talking about? What size is the engine? 6.0litres?



Mark






The new MB V12's are twin turbo, and yes, those numbers are right(for the AMG variant, at least)

75 Repu 01-07-2005 04:33 PM

meh.

defprun 01-07-2005 04:41 PM

i like it!

inanimate_object 01-07-2005 04:43 PM

Ok so you're talking about the engines in mercedes which have forced induction - because you can't change torque output on a naturally aspirated engine like that.



Mark

defprun 01-07-2005 04:59 PM

You know you can detune Naturally Aspirated engines. It's called heads that flow air poorly compared to the tuned ones and less compression. Along with ECU's that dont allow enough fuel/air, throttle bodies that arent as big, restrictive exhaust systems, smaller fuel pumps, smaller injectors, A/C, power steering, big stereo systems and neon.

inanimate_object 01-07-2005 05:26 PM


Originally Posted by defprun' date='Jan 7 2005, 11:58 PM
You know you can detune Naturally Aspirated engines. It's called heads that flow air poorly compared to the tuned ones and less compression. Along with ECU's that dont allow enough fuel/air, throttle bodies that arent as big, restrictive exhaust systems, smaller fuel pumps, smaller injectors, A/C, power steering, big stereo systems and neon.


Yeah but it's very hard to change the amount of peak torque in an engine - just see if you can find a n/a engine that doesn't produce around 70lbft/litre.



Mark

defprun 01-07-2005 05:29 PM

with them new engines you could hook the comp up to a computer and **** it all up and such.

mazdaspeed7 01-07-2005 07:35 PM

2001 Bmw M3. 262 ft lbs from a 3.2l, 82 ft lbs/l

75 Repu 01-08-2005 03:50 AM

hmmmm.. what ever happened to the koeniggseig.. ?

inanimate_object 01-08-2005 05:17 AM


Originally Posted by mazdaspeed7' date='Jan 8 2005, 02:34 AM
2001 Bmw M3. 262 ft lbs from a 3.2l, 82 ft lbs/l


OK fair enough - but that BMW engine isn't far off a race engine and has German precision engineering on its side. Regardless it's not a million miles from 70lb ft/litre and certainly not the difference between "over 1000ft/lbs" and "738".



Mark


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands