NoPistons -Mazda Rx7 & Rx8 Rotary Forum

NoPistons -Mazda Rx7 & Rx8 Rotary Forum (https://www.nopistons.com/)
-   Insert BS here (https://www.nopistons.com/insert-bs-here-12/)
-   -   For Srce And Other Zonda Fans (https://www.nopistons.com/insert-bs-here-12/srce-other-zonda-fans-42766/)

inanimate_object 01-07-2005 06:04 AM

up to 620bhp from 555, 50kg lighter = over 500bhp/tonne. Full article: http://www.autocar.co.uk/news_article.asp?na_id=212946



Mark

Klar 01-07-2005 09:34 AM

Nice.

FikseRxSeven 01-07-2005 01:11 PM

i saw an article about this car in car and driver magazine, and it says that they are detuning an engine that can produce 885lbs of torque down to 627lbs because they start to lose traction at 553lbs... go figure

93 R1 01-07-2005 01:43 PM

If its using the same motor as the old one that is the old old AMG v12. They should use the new one thats in the SL65 and CL65. 604hp 738ft/lbs twin turbo https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...IR#>/smile.png

inanimate_object 01-07-2005 01:52 PM


Originally Posted by FikseRxSeven' date='Jan 7 2005, 08:11 PM
i saw an article about this car in car and driver magazine, and it says that they are detuning an engine that can produce 885lbs of torque down to 627lbs because they start to lose traction at 553lbs... go figure


Sounds dodgy to me, AFAIK it is an AMG v12 and they were naturally aspitated so it would be impossible to change the torque by such a large margin.



Mark

93 R1 01-07-2005 02:01 PM


Originally Posted by inanimate_object' date='Jan 7 2005, 03:52 PM
Sounds dodgy to me, AFAIK it is an AMG v12 and they were naturally aspitated so it would be impossible to change the torque by such a large margin.



Mark




The new v12 was "detuned" from over 1000ft/lbs to 738 because they couldn't keep a gearbox behind it.

Srce 01-07-2005 02:09 PM

Don't like the extra headlight.

inanimate_object 01-07-2005 02:11 PM


Originally Posted by 93 R1' date='Jan 7 2005, 09:01 PM
The new v12 was "detuned" from over 1000ft/lbs to 738 because they couldn't keep a gearbox behind it.


Are you sure it's not power you're talking about? What size is the engine? 6.0litres?



Mark

Eyxom 01-07-2005 03:24 PM

SPOOOOGE!!! https://www.nopistons.com/forums/pub...IR#>/blink.png

FikseRxSeven 01-07-2005 03:36 PM


Originally Posted by inanimate_object' date='Jan 7 2005, 02:52 PM
Sounds dodgy to me, AFAIK it is an AMG v12 and they were naturally aspitated so it would be impossible to change the torque by such a large margin.



Mark






maybe... i quoted the exact numbers from the magazine in front of me

mazdaspeed7 01-07-2005 03:50 PM


Originally Posted by inanimate_object' date='Jan 7 2005, 04:10 PM
Are you sure it's not power you're talking about? What size is the engine? 6.0litres?



Mark






The new MB V12's are twin turbo, and yes, those numbers are right(for the AMG variant, at least)

75 Repu 01-07-2005 04:33 PM

meh.

defprun 01-07-2005 04:41 PM

i like it!

inanimate_object 01-07-2005 04:43 PM

Ok so you're talking about the engines in mercedes which have forced induction - because you can't change torque output on a naturally aspirated engine like that.



Mark

defprun 01-07-2005 04:59 PM

You know you can detune Naturally Aspirated engines. It's called heads that flow air poorly compared to the tuned ones and less compression. Along with ECU's that dont allow enough fuel/air, throttle bodies that arent as big, restrictive exhaust systems, smaller fuel pumps, smaller injectors, A/C, power steering, big stereo systems and neon.

inanimate_object 01-07-2005 05:26 PM


Originally Posted by defprun' date='Jan 7 2005, 11:58 PM
You know you can detune Naturally Aspirated engines. It's called heads that flow air poorly compared to the tuned ones and less compression. Along with ECU's that dont allow enough fuel/air, throttle bodies that arent as big, restrictive exhaust systems, smaller fuel pumps, smaller injectors, A/C, power steering, big stereo systems and neon.


Yeah but it's very hard to change the amount of peak torque in an engine - just see if you can find a n/a engine that doesn't produce around 70lbft/litre.



Mark

defprun 01-07-2005 05:29 PM

with them new engines you could hook the comp up to a computer and **** it all up and such.

mazdaspeed7 01-07-2005 07:35 PM

2001 Bmw M3. 262 ft lbs from a 3.2l, 82 ft lbs/l

75 Repu 01-08-2005 03:50 AM

hmmmm.. what ever happened to the koeniggseig.. ?

inanimate_object 01-08-2005 05:17 AM


Originally Posted by mazdaspeed7' date='Jan 8 2005, 02:34 AM
2001 Bmw M3. 262 ft lbs from a 3.2l, 82 ft lbs/l


OK fair enough - but that BMW engine isn't far off a race engine and has German precision engineering on its side. Regardless it's not a million miles from 70lb ft/litre and certainly not the difference between "over 1000ft/lbs" and "738".



Mark

mazdaspeed7 01-08-2005 11:53 AM


Originally Posted by inanimate_object' date='Jan 8 2005, 07:17 AM
OK fair enough - but that BMW engine isn't far off a race engine and has German precision engineering on its side. Regardless it's not a million miles from 70lb ft/litre and certainly not the difference between "over 1000ft/lbs" and "738".



Mark






How is that number hard to believe from a twin turbo intercooled 6.5l V12 (AMG variant)?



The STi makes 120 ft lbs/l and the Evo 8 makes 136.5 ft lbs/l. 738 ft lbs from a 6.5l is only 113 ft lbs/l. The Evo MR makes 143 ft lbs/l, and 1000 ft lbs from a 6.5l would be 154 ft lbs/l. That isnt very much of a stretch.

inanimate_object 01-08-2005 02:51 PM


Originally Posted by mazdaspeed7' date='Jan 8 2005, 06:53 PM
How is that number hard to believe from a twin turbo intercooled 6.5l V12 (AMG variant)?



The STi makes 120 ft lbs/l and the Evo 8 makes 136.5 ft lbs/l. 738 ft lbs from a 6.5l is only 113 ft lbs/l. The Evo MR makes 143 ft lbs/l, and 1000 ft lbs from a 6.5l would be 154 ft lbs/l. That isnt very much of a stretch.


It's not hard to believe at all, I was just under the impression that whoever it was was on about the Zonda engine which is naturally aspirated - in that case it would be hard to believe - that's all.



Mark


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands