Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

Sport Compact Disses Mazda Motor Company

Old Apr 7, 2003 | 12:30 PM
  #31  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

can you imagine having to rebadge all those mustangs 2.50?



mike
Old Apr 7, 2003 | 05:34 PM
  #32  
Rob x-7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,288
From: Amityville, New York
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Apr 7 2003, 12:30 PM
can you imagine having to rebadge all those mustangs 2.50?



mike
They are actually 4.9s

a 305 is a 5.0
Old Apr 7, 2003 | 05:49 PM
  #33  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Rob x-7' date='Apr 7 2003, 02:34 PM
[quote name='j9fd3s' date='Apr 7 2003, 12:30 PM'] can you imagine having to rebadge all those mustangs 2.50?



mike
They are actually 4.9s

a 305 is a 5.0 [/quote]

lets see, 4.9/2 = 2.450



mike
Old Apr 7, 2003 | 06:33 PM
  #34  
Apex13B's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,679
From: Colorado Springs
Default

ever wonder why mazda spent so much money on making a 4 rotor NA work at Le mans groupC rules?



mazda's formulae for wankel displacement has a correction factor in it, and the FIA's didnt, SO mazda went a ahead and took advantage of a loophole in the rules to make a "true" 2.6 liter motor. Under Group C rules no motor with a turbo charger can be over 1999cc of displacement, that therefore rules out the turbo 13b. The FIA said the motor was over 2 liters according to their books. So mazda took a porsche 962c tub, gearbox and suspension setup, bolted the now famous R26B motor onto the bulkhead, and put nice bodywork on it, and prayed that the porsche factory team's new electronic boost control would not last the race. Which it did..........................



the ******* 787b was a ******* porsche.......you ppl dont get it
Old Apr 7, 2003 | 06:34 PM
  #35  
Apex13B's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,679
From: Colorado Springs
Default

302 = 5.0 ford





305 = chevy small block.



just to be a picky ******* boinger builder, my ford BDD atlantic motor did 22 9800 rpm dyno pulls today
Old Apr 7, 2003 | 06:38 PM
  #36  
Apex13B's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,679
From: Colorado Springs
Default

nevermind my babbling



just recognize that mazda uses a correction factor in their math, i dont have it at home to explain
Old Apr 7, 2003 | 07:04 PM
  #37  
r_xplicit's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,305
From: jackson, ms
Default

Originally Posted by Apex13B' date='Apr 7 2003, 05:33 PM
ever wonder why mazda spent so much money on making a 4 rotor NA work at Le mans groupC rules?



mazda's formulae for wankel displacement has a correction factor in it, and the FIA's didnt, SO mazda went a ahead and took advantage of a loophole in the rules to make a "true" 2.6 liter motor. Under Group C rules no motor with a turbo charger can be over 1999cc of displacement, that therefore rules out the turbo 13b. The FIA said the motor was over 2 liters according to their books. So mazda took a porsche 962c tub, gearbox and suspension setup, bolted the now famous R26B motor onto the bulkhead, and put nice bodywork on it, and prayed that the porsche factory team's new electronic boost control would not last the race. Which it did..........................



the ******* 787b was a ******* porsche.......you ppl dont get it
ok, run that by me again....
Old Apr 7, 2003 | 07:11 PM
  #38  
Apex13B's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,679
From: Colorado Springs
Default

basically...mazda cheated via a motor displacement rule loophole, and got away with it. The 13bt (re,rew) is still considered a 2.6 liter motor to this very day, so mazda said **** YOU.....and made a 2.6 liter motor according to their math, which has 4 rotors.





the 787b uses a porsche 962c : gearbox,aero undertray, front and rear suspension, that is why the car was so good the first time out
Old Apr 7, 2003 | 07:16 PM
  #39  
Apex13B's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,679
From: Colorado Springs
Default

my grammar sucks..i gotta go back to school
Old Apr 7, 2003 | 07:58 PM
  #40  
r_xplicit's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,305
From: jackson, ms
Default

ok, cool...



now, about the article, the guy who wrote that story, dave coleman, is actually really cool...i met him once and have talked to him a few times via email.....although he is right AND wrong, i think that the jist of what he was trying to say was heard best in his office......he just likes to hear himself read. plus, that magazine has made him a god.......the first time i really paid any attention to what HE was doing in particular, was after he drove in the ONE LAP OF AMERICA race in 1999, or was it 2000???? i do not remember....however, i know that the guy CAN drive his *** off, and that, takes away some of his capriciousness....

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:02 PM.