That is exactly why we didnt declare war on russia or vice versa. Now think of this, If the most powerful country in the world attacks you a much smaller, less populated, third world country what would you do? I would bring out the big guns(nukes) to take out as many of my enamy as possible. Iraq didnt do that because they were missing something. THE WEAPONS!!!!





Um but we then declared war on them. There were rumors floating around of the atrocities that the ***** were inflicting on the Jews and that wasnt enough of a motive for the US to declare war. So now we attack on the rumor that Iraq has nuclear weapons. That makes a lot of sense to me.





I think I have proven my point and I wil not vote for Bush because I am not satisfied with the job he has done. That is reason enough for me to want somebody else in the white house.

 

Well if you want to go off topic.. what happens when you start popping off nukes left and right? Its called Nuclear Winter and the virtual end of humanity and the proliferation of cockroaches...



And not to come off anti-semitic, but at that point in American History when was it our business that the jewish race was being exterminated in Europe? At that point Americas standpoint was neutral and though I'm sure a few people wanted to get into the war, Our president at the time who was IMO the best leader of the 20th century kept us out as long as possible. And of course we declared war after they declared war on us. My point is check your statements before you make them



What is right is not always popular

Whats popular is not always right... Remember that

 

Well when your back is against the wall, people tend to not lookto far ahead. Saddam's entire world came crashing down around him when something like that happens peolpe actions tend to become eratic and irresponsible. Second why the hell would Sadam care about a nuclear winter? If he doesnt get killed hes gonna rot in a prison cell for the rest of his life.







You need to learn your history pal. The actions of the US toward each side of the WW2 didnt promote the fact that we were nutral.



Banning all trade with the Axis powers. Including the invaluble steel that the US traded to Japan which they used to build their warships. I dont know if you know this or not, but Japan is an island with no natural resources of their own so they have to trade to get many of the materials to make we would consider lifes essiantials. Selling and trading weapons that were used in WW1 to the Allies.



We certainly were neutral.



[/QUOTE]What is right is not always popular

Whats popular is not always right... Remember that [QUOTE]





But you should also remember that great minds think alike and Hitler said this



The art of leadership ... consists in consolidating the attention of the people against a single adversary and taking care that nothing will split up that attention.... The leader of genius must have the ability to make different opponents appear as if they belonged to one category.

 

We need a strong president and not some wuss liek Clinton. Kerry seems too much like clinton for my taste.

 

When in doubt knock them out.

Next time ya get in a bar and some dude doesnt like ya just cause, just talk to him be nice , because he's gonna take you out .....dont do anything.

yeah ..... wait



Screw waiting for more 911's. They want too because thats all they have been indoctrinated with and your not gonna change it. Remember they hate everything liberal stands for: free to do what you want, free love, multiple views of relationships with Gods or sexes. they hate liberal ideas , woman's right, different races, they practice state religon .

the very ideas that libralism is about is what they hate and they picture U.S. as such.



Yeah , like Kerry really is giving them a message.They want him cause he wont get after them...he said so on declining 87mil. to support financing our troops.

 

What is right is not always popular

Whats popular is not always right... Remember that Hitler was also one of the best leaders the world has ever seen. He brought Germany from a demolished and ashamed state that was completely poor and humiliated by the Versailles treaty to a super strong world power, with a very strong economy and sense of nationalism.



If he would have stopped in late 1938 and not invaded poland, history might have seen him as one of the best leaders in our modern world.

 

That's three words you imbicile!

 

Each election that I've witnessed is the same: you choose the lesser of two evils. At least with this election year, the candidates are actually differing somewhat, unlike the Gore vs. Bush, Jr. election year.



This will be the first I can vote in and I still don't know who to vote for. I completely disagree with this administrations' passing of the Patriot Act and its waste of time with the war.



Right now I know I will not vote for Bush.

 

But he didnt stop. I never said that Hitler was a bad leader, he did everything that you said and more. If he didnt invade poland and all the other weaker countries in Europe, then he would have gone down as one of the greatest and most influential leaders in history.



But also if he didnt invade Russia and loose a couple million soldiers and create for himself a two front war then he most likely would have won WW2 because he would have had the men and supplies that he needed to invade Britian and then take out Russia. And when the US entered in to the war we would have had to take Europe Asia Africa and maybe even Austraila to beat the Axis. History can play out a thousand different ways if you think "what if this person didnt do that".

 

LOL we could go on for hours about WW2...



Yeah, I think if hitler didnt switch boming from britans airfields to the citys he would have crushed the RAF and taken britan...Some dumbass German got lost and droped his load of bombs and hit london by accident. Funny how one person could change the course of the war like that...