Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

Mazda Profit Up 40 Percent!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-14-2004, 03:18 AM
  #41  
Member
 
Nan da yo!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 87
Default

In case you didn't read the numbers the 8 is doing well. I dunno where you guys came up with the fact that it wasn't. Hell its already sold more than all three years the FD was out here for. As for it not performing well, did you drive an auto? Those things have the ability to smoke the pants off of any 350Z or G35. Mazda seems to effectively have most of the bases covered as far as cars go, they small agile sports car (Mazdaspeed [or not] Miata) Flagship sports car (rx-8) mid size sedan (6) and the small sedan (3). All stylish and reliable.



The fact that they don't sell many trucks, vans, or SUVs is a shame since thats where car makers make most of their profits from. That's why I think Mazda is a great car company, they kinda sitback and do their own little thing and they've always been scooting right along.



P.S. You can call the RX-8 a grocery getter or not call it a sports car all you want, but its more a sports car than the evo or STi wish they could ever be.
Nan da yo! is offline  
Old 05-14-2004, 08:42 AM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
defprun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,016
Default

Originally Posted by Rob x-7' date='May 13 2004, 06:55 PM
12 less?



people werent breaking 170 on the dyno at the wheels
RX-8 is hp limited until the engine is broken in, much like 2nd gens were. Asshats who didnt know what they were doing would take a fresh car, strap it to the dyno and rev the **** out of it, to see how much HP it REALLY has.



Take a nicely broken in RX-8 for a drive after 10 000kms (7500 miles).
defprun is offline  
Old 05-14-2004, 09:47 AM
  #43  
Senior Member
 
TYSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 2,871
Default

Originally Posted by Dramon_Killer' date='May 14 2004, 12:27 AM
The other cars in its price range.
Which are?



Here, the 350Z is $10,000 more, the Corvette is $30,000 more. Subaru STi is $10,000 more, so's the Chrysler Crossfire. The Cadillac CTS, Lexus IS300, Infinity G35, BMW 3-Series, Jaguar X-Type and Mercedes C-Class all cost at least $5000 more in any combination of sport packages that could even HOPE to keep up. The EVO isn't available here, but for you it's $3000 more, so's the R32 Golf.



V-8 Mustangs and Subaru WRX are about the same money, is this what you're using to compare? Accord V-6 Coupe? RSX Type-S? Mini Cooper S? Celica GT-S?
TYSON is offline  
Old 05-14-2004, 09:48 AM
  #44  
Senior Member
 
defprun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,016
Default

BUUURRRNNN



Sink 10 G's into an RX8 and im sure it could hold its own against a 350Z
defprun is offline  
Old 05-14-2004, 09:52 AM
  #45  
Member
 
Authentic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 69
Default

The mazda 3 has Ford Focus underpinnings, Focus being the best selling small car in america, it straight up beat the civic.



..The reason they didn't continue with the 7 wasn't ford, Ford kept mazda out of bankruptcy, or did you think mazda wanted to sell a 1/3 of itself? The 7 was a money pit for them, also it wasn't marketed right, too expensive as well.



Ps sink a 75hp shot of n20 and it holds itself against the z. All the mags still say the rx08 is the better sports car, albeit lacking power.
Authentic is offline  
Old 05-14-2004, 09:55 AM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
defprun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,016
Default

You dont even need no2. Catback exhaust and maybe tweak the stock comp in favour of high emissions and it would hold its own against alot of ****.
defprun is offline  
Old 05-14-2004, 10:34 AM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
FDRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cedarville, New Jersey
Posts: 141
Default

The one i drove was an auto, and it was right before they were released. The local mazda dealer had one in and was offering free test drives about a month before they were actually on the sales floor.
FDRacing is offline  
Old 05-14-2004, 11:15 AM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
TYSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 2,871
Default

Originally Posted by FDRacing' date='May 14 2004, 11:34 AM
The one i drove was an auto, and it was right before they were released. The local mazda dealer had one in and was offering free test drives about a month before they were actually on the sales floor.
You know the auto is rated for 40hp less than the manual, right? I would expect a 145hp manual tranny car to feel more lively than a 195hp auto car. Especially with a 400lb weight advantage.



That's like driving a base Neon and telling everyone you know the SRT-4 is slow bacause you drove one.
TYSON is offline  
Old 05-14-2004, 11:25 AM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
FDRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cedarville, New Jersey
Posts: 141
Default

I didnt consider the difference in the manual and auto, thats probably the whole problem.
FDRacing is offline  
Old 05-14-2004, 04:20 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
rfreeman27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: fredneck MD
Posts: 4,107
Default

Originally Posted by FDRacing' date='May 14 2004, 12:25 PM
I didnt consider the difference in the manual and auto, thats probably the whole problem.
LOL you drove an auto!! I was wondering why you said your FC NA was faster
rfreeman27 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1988RedT2
Insert BS here
17
02-09-2007 10:44 PM
1988RedT2
Insert BS here
3
05-01-2006 01:52 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Mazda Profit Up 40 Percent!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:15 AM.