Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

mazda idling stop system

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2009 | 12:59 PM
  #11  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by teknics' post='916556' date='Feb 12 2009, 05:01 PM
meh shut it down to one-cylinde ror something, dont stop all the motion, plus doesnt it use more gas to fire up the engine then to idle it?



kevin.


no mazda stops the engine, and then restarts without the starter. they claim 10% fuel savings
Old Feb 14, 2009 | 03:14 PM
  #12  
teknics's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,837
From: Wayne, NJ
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' post='916618' date='Feb 13 2009, 01:59 PM
no mazda stops the engine, and then restarts without the starter. they claim 10% fuel savings


im actually going to have to read the thing you posted i guess. bastid.



kevin.
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 02:47 PM
  #13  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by teknics' post='916674' date='Feb 14 2009, 01:14 PM
im actually going to have to read the thing you posted i guess. bastid.



kevin.


touche`
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 05:21 PM
  #14  
TYSON's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,871
From: London, Ontario
Default

My car would start with a 9ms injector prime pulse, that's about all the extra fuel used during starting, so that's what, 1/4 second worth of idle fuel?



as for reliability, that doesn't look like much more than another bunch of code in the ECU, it should be more reliable than starting with the key if you think about it. It looks like a strange bumpstart sequence.
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 05:37 PM
  #15  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by TYSON' post='916797' date='Feb 16 2009, 03:21 PM
My car would start with a 9ms injector prime pulse, that's about all the extra fuel used during starting, so that's what, 1/4 second worth of idle fuel?



as for reliability, that doesn't look like much more than another bunch of code in the ECU, it should be more reliable than starting with the key if you think about it. It looks like a strange bumpstart sequence.


if you stop the engine in the right place, with fuel in the cylinder, firing the spark plug will get it moving enough to run (as those of use with haltechs know!)



i guess the trick was stopping the engine in the right place everytime
Old Feb 16, 2009 | 05:51 PM
  #16  
TYSON's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,871
From: London, Ontario
Default

hahaha





mine usually just made that bang noise with key-on!
Old Feb 18, 2009 | 11:35 AM
  #17  
cymfc3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,145
From: San Jose, CA
Default

Originally Posted by teknics' post='916556' date='Feb 12 2009, 05:01 PM
meh shut it down to one-cylinde ror something, dont stop all the motion, plus doesnt it use more gas to fire up the engine then to idle it?



kevin.


Yes.



http://www.mazda.com/mazdaspirit/env/engine/siss2.html



Its pretty cool actually, neat idea. You could never do that with the RX8 though, they'd have to call it the iFlood or iPushStart
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FrestyleFC3S
2nd Generation Specific
10
Jul 30, 2003 10:17 PM
guru
RX-7 & RX-8 Parts For Sale & Wanted
0
Jan 4, 2003 12:44 PM
hotaggie98
2nd Generation Specific
0
Oct 3, 2002 07:54 AM
vosko
2nd Generation Specific
54
Jul 6, 2002 03:56 PM
Turbo II
2nd Generation Specific
3
Apr 10, 2002 11:51 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 PM.