Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

"I just don't get it!" [/Seinfeld]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 11:16 PM
  #1  
PhoenixDownVII's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 635
From: Orange County, NY
Default

You know those pool tables that you play on where you put in 4 quarters (that's a dollar) and it drops you the set of *****....but as you sink them in, they go back in "Storage"...yet...if you scratch the white ball...it somehow knows it and puts it back to a spot where you can grab it again and again...



...well...how does it know it? I mean...the white ball is falling into a spot where every other numbered ball falls...yet somehow the table KNOWS to not sort that in the containment section thingy and send it back to the other spot...



Pool Table Gnomes?
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 11:19 PM
  #2  
boxrs4sale's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 682
From: Delaware
Default

i wondered the same thing... lol.
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 11:24 PM
  #3  
TYSON's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,871
From: London, Ontario
Default

It's bigger!
Old Jan 25, 2006 | 11:34 PM
  #4  
JimmyJimboJet's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,113
From: Wi nøt trei a høliday in Sweden this yër?
Default

i can't tell if you're just being a smartass or not, but here's the answer anyway:



the cueball doesn't weigh the same as the numbered *****. I can't remember if it weighs more or less though, but I'm betting on more. when you sink the *****, they are guided back to the 'window' by a set of rails. somewhere along the way, there is a weight-specific mechanism that is only tripped by a certain weight (any ***** weighing more/less than the play/numbered *****). not all cueballs weigh the same though, they all just weigh more/less than the numbered/play *****.
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 01:38 AM
  #5  
Il RX8 lI's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 842
From: AL
Default

I also understand that the cue ball is also just slightly smaller as well.
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 08:24 AM
  #6  
1988RedT2's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,535
From: VA
Default

Pretty sure that the cue ball is just slightly smaller and falls through the mechanism that keeps the other *****. Take your calipers to the pool hall next time!
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 08:29 AM
  #7  
PhoenixDownVII's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 635
From: Orange County, NY
Default

Originally Posted by JimmyJimboJet' post='796416' date='Jan 26 2006, 12:34 AM

i can't tell if you're just being a smartass or not, but here's the answer anyway:


No, I was being serious...smartass.



Yea, Me and my friend just shrugged and assumed it could be the weight, even perhaps the size, but it seemed to be the same.



I'm still voting for the Pool Table Gnomes on this one.
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 11:42 AM
  #8  
Dramon_Killer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,784
Default

It actually has nothing to do with weight. At least not with modern pool tables which contain a small optic sensor. Becuase the cue ball is completely white it reads this and activates a solenoid which diverts the ball away from the other *****.
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 02:27 PM
  #9  
Dysfnctnl85's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,483
From: Fayetteville, Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by Dramon_Killer' post='796523' date='Jan 26 2006, 12:42 PM

It actually has nothing to do with weight. At least not with modern pool tables which contain a small optic sensor. Becuase the cue ball is completely white it reads this and activates a solenoid which diverts the ball away from the other *****.


In older tables (mine's an antique), there is an arm that "sends" the cueball to the breaking end of the table due to its different size.



It would be helpful to mention that mine is also a restored pool-hall table, complete with slots for quarters and a counter that reads the number of games played on the table...over a million .
Old Jan 26, 2006 | 02:34 PM
  #10  
TYSON's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,871
From: London, Ontario
Default

A million?



If it was 50 years old that's 55 games a day. I think maybe it counts kinda funny.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 AM.