Do You Really Want A New Rx-7?
#1
Honestly, do you really want a new 4th gen RX-7? I think they should let the RX-7 name pass on.
That doesn't mean I think that Mazda shouldn't attempt to make an all out rotary sports car (with only two seats!). I just think the name should signify they've moved on. Therefore, it should be the RX-9.
The rotary engine and all of Mazda's rotary offerings have lots of history and heritage, but it doesn't lie with the numeral "7", it lies in RX.
Thoughts?
That doesn't mean I think that Mazda shouldn't attempt to make an all out rotary sports car (with only two seats!). I just think the name should signify they've moved on. Therefore, it should be the RX-9.
The rotary engine and all of Mazda's rotary offerings have lots of history and heritage, but it doesn't lie with the numeral "7", it lies in RX.
Thoughts?
#3
Originally Posted by JerryLH3' date='Jul 3 2003, 12:08 PM
Honestly, do you really want a new 4th gen RX-7? I think they should let the RX-7 name pass on.
That doesn't mean I think that Mazda shouldn't attempt to make an all out rotary sports car (with only two seats!). I just think the name should signify they've moved on. Therefore, it should be the RX-9.
The rotary engine and all of Mazda's rotary offerings have lots of history and heritage, but it doesn't lie with the numeral "7", it lies in RX.
Thoughts?
That doesn't mean I think that Mazda shouldn't attempt to make an all out rotary sports car (with only two seats!). I just think the name should signify they've moved on. Therefore, it should be the RX-9.
The rotary engine and all of Mazda's rotary offerings have lots of history and heritage, but it doesn't lie with the numeral "7", it lies in RX.
Thoughts?