Anyone See Fahrenheit 9/11?
06-28-2004, 11:46 PM
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 464
Originally Posted by ColinRX7' date='Jun 28 2004, 08:32 PM
I guess I gotta see the movie
I could see him being an extremist over stuff.. That's what gets peoples attention
All he really wants is to get people to dig deeper than the surface of the public media
I have only seen him in interviews and for the most part he seems pretty genuine, not too in your face or crazy..
I could see him being an extremist over stuff.. That's what gets peoples attention
All he really wants is to get people to dig deeper than the surface of the public media
I have only seen him in interviews and for the most part he seems pretty genuine, not too in your face or crazy..
he is a manipulative, lying, slandering bastard that needs to be forced to admit to his bullshit and all the **** he caused to the people of the world.
06-29-2004, 07:18 AM
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: green brook, nj
Posts: 792
Originally Posted by venomrx7' date='Jun 28 2004, 11:43 PM
and when he accuses bush of not doing anything at the begging of his taking office, he failed to mention the tax cuts that Bush got, probably because he saved a ton of money on them, and God forbid he have anything good to say.
only reason there was tax cuts is because they took away from college money
06-29-2004, 07:19 AM
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: green brook, nj
Posts: 792
Originally Posted by venomrx7' date='Jun 28 2004, 11:46 PM
I have no problem with him attempting to show people the truth, but nothing in his movie IS the truth. its all lies. and he is no where near genuine. he goes around in his little ball cap trying to fit in with the middle and lower class, when he is a ****** multi millionaire!! out for the little guy my ***.
he is a manipulative, lying, slandering bastard that needs to be forced to admit to his bullshit and all the **** he caused to the people of the world.
he is a manipulative, lying, slandering bastard that needs to be forced to admit to his bullshit and all the **** he caused to the people of the world.
06-29-2004, 07:23 AM
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: green brook, nj
Posts: 792
Originally Posted by mazdadrifter' date='Jun 28 2004, 07:46 PM
Oh yeah, and this is still the same guy that refuses to let people blame marolyn mansion for columbine, but yet he blamed K-MART right? I mean come on people this guy is rush's nemisis, not the second coming of jesus.
and i bet he smells funny too
and i bet he smells funny too
06-29-2004, 08:14 AM
#36
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 2,532
Originally Posted by ColinRX7' date='Jun 28 2004, 01:55 PM
It's not his opinion, it's the views that are not presented by your shitty one-sided media.
I can hardly sit through any American news station without feeling like I'm being force-fed a bullshit point of view rather than just plain facts.
I can hardly sit through any American news station without feeling like I'm being force-fed a bullshit point of view rather than just plain facts.
Are you saying that the US media are pro-Bush?
The fact is that the overwhelming majority of US media are fanatically liberal in ideology and that fanaticism is reflected in their rendering of the "facts."
All we hear about is a few tragic US casualties and a little prisoner abuse. Nothing about the liberation of a people and the overthrow of a tyrant. Nothing about the "big picture."
The US media has been relentless in their criticism of Bush and the Iraq war in spite of the facts.
06-29-2004, 08:24 AM
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,502
Originally Posted by 1988RedT2' date='Jun 29 2004, 09:14 AM
You're kidding, right?
Are you saying that the US media are pro-Bush?
Are you saying that the US media are pro-Bush?
I'm saying the media will bend truth or imply a pre-concieved story FOR you rather than just give you plain facts and let you make your own decision
You even said yourself, they criticize Bush all the time. If they were only reporting straight up facts then why would everyone say Bush is getting criticized all the time?
06-29-2004, 08:30 AM
#39
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: green brook, nj
Posts: 792
Originally Posted by 1988RedT2' date='Jun 29 2004, 08:14 AM
You're kidding, right?
Are you saying that the US media are pro-Bush?
The fact is that the overwhelming majority of US media are fanatically liberal in ideology and that fanaticism is reflected in their rendering of the "facts."
All we hear about is a few tragic US casualties and a little prisoner abuse. Nothing about the liberation of a people and the overthrow of a tyrant. Nothing about the "big picture."
The US media has been relentless in their criticism of Bush and the Iraq war in spite of the facts.
Are you saying that the US media are pro-Bush?
The fact is that the overwhelming majority of US media are fanatically liberal in ideology and that fanaticism is reflected in their rendering of the "facts."
All we hear about is a few tragic US casualties and a little prisoner abuse. Nothing about the liberation of a people and the overthrow of a tyrant. Nothing about the "big picture."
The US media has been relentless in their criticism of Bush and the Iraq war in spite of the facts.
my thoughts on the weapons are that we gave him way to much time to get rid of them weapons, but still the two reason we went into iraq were false, this whole thing is about oil and impressing his daddy...and doing what his daddy couldn't do