3dmark03 Benchmark
04-25-2003, 09:56 AM
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,837
i dunno, i havent looked inside the computer, all they told me was it's 2.6Ghz with 512 ddr ram. the rest they said i dont have to worry about. it was designed to make their games run as fast as possible. they said they designed the system around their development computers for GTA3 and GTA:VC and that it would run those games faster then other shelf-bought systems.
that test was in 1024x768x32 mode BTW.
my benchmark with my old homebuilt pc would probably be like 700, it was ***** till they sent me this one.
kevin.
that test was in 1024x768x32 mode BTW.
my benchmark with my old homebuilt pc would probably be like 700, it was ***** till they sent me this one.
kevin.
04-25-2003, 10:03 AM
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,234
Ah. Reason I asked is my XP1800/512 DDR/Radeon 8500LE 128mb rig pulled a best of 8900 marks in 3dmark01.
Also you usually run the tests with FSAA and AF disabled and use the default 3dmark settings for best scores I think.
Also you usually run the tests with FSAA and AF disabled and use the default 3dmark settings for best scores I think.
04-25-2003, 10:05 AM
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,837
Originally Posted by Geoffman72' date='Apr 25 2003, 10:03 AM
Ah. Reason I asked is my XP1800/512 DDR/Radeon 8500LE 128mb rig pulled a best of 8900 marks in 3dmark01.
Also you usually run the tests with FSAA and AF disabled and use the default 3dmark settings for best scores I think.
Also you usually run the tests with FSAA and AF disabled and use the default 3dmark settings for best scores I think.
kevin.
04-25-2003, 10:34 AM
#17
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 17,839
Originally Posted by drew' date='Apr 25 2003, 09:23 AM
you have an nvidia video card in that thing don't you? I've read a bunch of stuff that says that benchmark is geared towards ATI
I got 1475 on the 03 benchmark and 11500 on 01SE with:
Athlon 2800+ (barton core, 512K cache)
Asus MB with nForce2
1 GB DDR @ 400 dual channel
4 x 120GB WD (8MB cache) @ raid5 (Adaptec 2400A with 128MB cache)
nVidia Ti 4200 w 64MB
most of those becnhmarks in 3dmark03 looked like they weren't even using the card at all... 3-5 fps... bullshit...
I got 1475 on the 03 benchmark and 11500 on 01SE with:
Athlon 2800+ (barton core, 512K cache)
Asus MB with nForce2
1 GB DDR @ 400 dual channel
4 x 120GB WD (8MB cache) @ raid5 (Adaptec 2400A with 128MB cache)
nVidia Ti 4200 w 64MB
most of those becnhmarks in 3dmark03 looked like they weren't even using the card at all... 3-5 fps... bullshit...
i have a GF4 Ti 4600 ...
P4 3.06
512 DDR PC2700
WD 120GB 8MB 7200RPM
INTEL MB