Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

3000gt Vr-4 Or Fd

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-05-2003, 02:15 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
FrestyleFC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Schofield Barracks, HI
Posts: 2,259
Default

one thing i love about dramon is that....he knows his priorities.....



"wellll i cant find a good Turbo II, so ill settle for an FD..."



FrestyleFC3S is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 03:00 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
UniqueTII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 4,773
Default

Originally Posted by Dramon_Killer' date='Jul 5 2003, 03:29 AM
On top of that you dont have the aluminum hood or any of the other nice TII goodies.
Some N/As have aluminum hoods and some TIIs (mine ) have steel hoods.
UniqueTII is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 03:06 PM
  #23  
Member
 
stealth94rttt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 42
Default

I know its a little late for the opinions but i figured id put my $0.02 in anyway. First of all you have to ask yourself how much money you have to spend. The hard part will be finding something within your price range.

A VR-4 will cost a lot to keep in good condition, but if you treat it right it will treat you right. I speak from personal experience and can say that you will pay at least 2-3 thousand in repairs and maintenance a year. Aftermarket support is not that big yet but the VR-4 is started to get recognized.

Another thing you have to ask yourself is "Do I want a track car or a strip car?"

If you want a track car then don't even think about getting a VR-4. They are not as nimble as the RX-7 and the AWD is a killer on the tight turns. With this you also have to remember that you will be in a different class then the RX-7 so you can still do very good in your class.

As a drag car the VR-4 definetly is not a bad choice for the price. The car has the capabilities of hitting mid 13's with a good driver and about $200 if that in mods. The AWD grips and will give lower 60' then an RX-7, stock for stock, of course.

If you want to go under 12's it will be costly in a VR-4 due to the expense of the aftermarket parts.

Overall both cars have great looks and both perform well in there areas. If you can afford it and want a track and drag car go with the RX-7. If you can't but still want a fast drag car and will be able to afford the maintenence then go for a VR-4 or better yet a Stealth.

Just remember, whatever you get modding a car is an addiction and they will both cost a lot in the end. It all depends on what you can afford now.

Josh
stealth94rttt is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 03:22 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Travisty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 331
Default

Originally Posted by Race_87RX7' date='Jul 4 2003, 10:11 PM
my ex had a 3000GT, it was a 95, problems out the *** and only had 40k on it when she bought it.
Thats what i always hear but my roomate got his 91 VR4 with 116k miles on it and right now he has 170k roughly.

he has the worst valve tap i have ever heard but for some reason the car just doesnt die.



he has intake, full exhaust turbos back, clutch, boost controller, couple other small mods and the best he has run is a 13.7 cause the kid cant drive for ****.



i have driven the car several times and although it is pretty fast i had more fun in my non turbo S5 FC.



its a grand touring car for a reason....... lots of stupid amenities that you dont need.
Travisty is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 03:26 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
UniqueTII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 4,773
Default

Originally Posted by Travisty' date='Jul 5 2003, 03:22 PM
its a grand touring car for a reason....... lots of stupid amenities that you dont need.
Everybody needs active aero.
UniqueTII is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 03:27 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
FrestyleFC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Schofield Barracks, HI
Posts: 2,259
Default

bahahahahaha
FrestyleFC3S is offline  
Old 07-05-2003, 03:28 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
FrestyleFC3S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Schofield Barracks, HI
Posts: 2,259
Default

its the best when they say "yea it kicks in and i really feel the difference in downforce
FrestyleFC3S is offline  
Old 07-06-2003, 10:47 AM
  #28  
Member
 
RotaryXplosion7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 52
Default

vR-4's are way too heavy stick with the FD.
RotaryXplosion7 is offline  
Old 07-06-2003, 12:54 PM
  #29  
Senior Member
 
Benny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 980
Default

bwahaha. that active aero wing is ghey to the max! it didnt do **** for the car... i used to have it on my 93
Benny is offline  
Old 07-06-2003, 01:49 PM
  #30  
Member
 
RotorRocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Detroit,Mi
Posts: 33
Default

FD!
RotorRocket is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jayshadow
RX-7 & RX-8 For Sale
5
09-10-2003 01:42 AM
jayshadow
RX-7 & RX-8 For Sale
0
03-29-2003 01:13 AM
jayshadow
RX-7 & RX-8 For Sale
3
02-23-2003 01:48 AM
SnowmanSteiner
Kills
4
06-17-2002 11:18 PM
JaySpec7
Other Cars
18
11-27-2001 04:19 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: 3000gt Vr-4 Or Fd



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 AM.