Warning: Check Your Timing Split!
#1
I've always felt, reasoned and had experts agree that it's bad to have the trailing ignition fire before the leading. I believe this a PRIME engine popper when encountered at the right/enough times.
I just reviewed a map from a reputable mechanic. There were 22 incidents of negative split in his "tuned" map.
If you have a PFC and Datalogit, it's easy to check on the TRAILING screen. Click on the split checkbox.
CHECK YOUR MAPS!
I just reviewed a map from a reputable mechanic. There were 22 incidents of negative split in his "tuned" map.
If you have a PFC and Datalogit, it's easy to check on the TRAILING screen. Click on the split checkbox.
CHECK YOUR MAPS!
#5
i just recently figured out how read POWERFCESE
to program a powerFC you take a base unit "r" and multiply by the number in the cell for instance of above
-14 x R = -14R
put in a number for R say 5
you get R= -70
that is how you read a PowerFC map and its correction factors :bigthumg:
to program a powerFC you take a base unit "r" and multiply by the number in the cell for instance of above
-14 x R = -14R
put in a number for R say 5
you get R= -70
that is how you read a PowerFC map and its correction factors :bigthumg:
#6
Originally Posted by Badog' date='Jan 21 2003, 09:02 PM
I've always felt, reasoned and had experts agree that it's bad to have the trailing ignition fire before the leading. I believe this a PRIME engine popper when encountered at the right/enough times.
I just reviewed a map from a reputable mechanic. There were 22 incidents of negative split in his "tuned" map.
If you have a PFC and Datalogit, it's easy to check on the TRAILING screen. Click on the split checkbox.
CHECK YOUR MAPS!
I just reviewed a map from a reputable mechanic. There were 22 incidents of negative split in his "tuned" map.
If you have a PFC and Datalogit, it's easy to check on the TRAILING screen. Click on the split checkbox.
CHECK YOUR MAPS!
#8
is the PFC acurate enough to NOT fire the trailing before the leading in the case of all the 0 splits? just wondering. i am not familiar with the pfc... but from what i can make out, it looks as if the split actualy increases in the higher rpm/boost ranges. (if that is what they are). my question... in those areas, do you think it may be wiser to actualy decrease the split to make up for the higer speed of the motor? in some instances it looks as if the split is 15* after. the way i have mine set up in the haltech is that the split actualy is lower at the higher boost levels... lets debate the split a little bit here.