ECU Discussions Area for Haltech, Power FC, MOTEC and other ECUs

S-AFCII or stand alone?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2005, 03:12 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
DarkHorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3
Default

Hey everyone. I am looking at buying a used 93 RX-7. The owner has made some aftermarket mods to it including a bigger intercooler, intake, rebuilt turbos, boost controller, grounding kit, catless downpipe, high flow center cat (although the stock center cat is on the car as of now), and a catback exhaust. However, the car needs engine management of some sort. Does anyone have advice as to whether a fuel controller like the S-AFCII would be good or if a full stand alone ECU like the Power FC and Commander would be better/safer? Also, are there any recommended places to go to in the Virginia/DC/Maryland area to have tuning done?
DarkHorse is offline  
Old 09-21-2005, 07:11 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
ColinRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,502
Default

You're better off with a full standalone, the SAFCII just kind of tricks the stock componentry into dumping in more fuel.



You have way more control and accuracy (in my experience) with a real standalone.



BTW, if this guy tries to haggle with you that the "grounding kit" was real expensive, tell him he got gyped.. Don't pay extra for the car just because a "ground kit" is on a list of mods. Ground kits don't make horsepower. Just FYI.
ColinRX7 is offline  
Old 09-21-2005, 10:37 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
DarkHorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3
Default

Thanks for the info. With the Power FC I'd definately need to find a good tuner in the area.
DarkHorse is offline  
Old 09-21-2005, 10:38 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
DarkHorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3
Default

One more thing. Would using a S-AFCII in favor of the Power FC compromise the safety of the engine?
DarkHorse is offline  
Old 09-28-2005, 09:31 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
ColinRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,502
Default

In my opinion, quite possibly.



More control over what's happening is more control, which mean less chance of running into a serious issue.. The SAFCII isn't setup like the Power FC, the Power FC has alot more control.
ColinRX7 is offline  
Old 09-28-2005, 02:23 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Dramon_Killer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,784
Default

I hear the emanage ultimate is supposed to be pretty good.
Dramon_Killer is offline  
Old 10-08-2005, 07:13 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Default

Originally Posted by ArsenalFC' post='761291' date='Sep 21 2005, 08:38 PM

One more thing. Would using a S-AFCII in favor of the Power FC compromise the safety of the engine?


power fc is setup pretty good out of the box. the safc isnt really a great idea on an fd
j9fd3s is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
alaskarotorhead
3rd Generation Specific
2
03-25-2006 08:29 PM
matts86fc3s
2nd Generation Specific
1
12-04-2005 10:39 AM
smitty
ECU Discussions
7
09-14-2005 11:51 PM
banzaitoyota
ECU Discussions
6
04-27-2004 09:04 PM
rmaiersg
2nd Generation Specific
8
09-21-2003 08:43 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: S-AFCII or stand alone?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:07 PM.