3rd Generation Specific Talk about 3rd gen RX-7's here.

Turbos Gone At 65k

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2003 | 02:41 PM
  #11  
9BASE3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,331
From: Frederick MD
Default

Well.. The turbos look FINE. No shaft play at all... Spin free.





They don't appear to be leaking the oil.. but oil is puddled right under the manifold... Is there anything else that could leak oil into the exhaust and cause all the goddamn smoking and puddling?
Old Apr 11, 2003 | 02:48 PM
  #12  
FikseRxSeven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,079
From: union, new jersey
Default

maybe your lines are cracked
Old Apr 11, 2003 | 02:48 PM
  #13  
FikseRxSeven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,079
From: union, new jersey
Default

if you have a f'd up turbo....... wont the oil be building up in the inside of the turbos and intake piping....... shouldnt be on the ground
Old Apr 11, 2003 | 02:50 PM
  #14  
vosko's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,839
From: NJ
Default

if the turbos are fine, could be the oil seals on the engine...
Old Apr 11, 2003 | 03:49 PM
  #15  
9BASE3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,331
From: Frederick MD
Default

Originally Posted by vosko' date='Apr 11 2003, 01:50 PM
if the turbos are fine, could be the oil seals on the engine...
That's just what I was thinking...



How do I know for sure? I still have to take the rest of the manifold off... I removed the turbos from the manifold first... I still can't quite see exactly where the oil is leaking... But I'll soon find out I hope.
Old Apr 11, 2003 | 03:59 PM
  #16  
vosko's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,839
From: NJ
Default

there is one easy way .... LOL



run the engine with no turbos on it and see if it still smokes like a bitch ah the beauty of MAP sensor lol
Old Apr 11, 2003 | 04:17 PM
  #17  
FikseRxSeven's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,079
From: union, new jersey
Default

hehe, an n/a fd
Old Apr 11, 2003 | 06:46 PM
  #18  
9BASE3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,331
From: Frederick MD
Default

Originally Posted by vosko' date='Apr 11 2003, 02:59 PM
there is one easy way .... LOL



run the engine with no turbos on it and see if it still smokes like a bitch ah the beauty of MAP sensor lol
I can bet that would be just sick LOUD. Seeing as I'd have to run it open manifold... Uh... NO. I'll just ******* rebuild it. Hell, it has 65K on it anyway... Goddammit...
Old Apr 11, 2003 | 07:02 PM
  #19  
relisys190's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 582
From: Tampa
Default

This is somewhat but would a N/A FD be slow?



anyone ever run their FD without their turbo's bolted on?
Old Apr 11, 2003 | 09:16 PM
  #20  
9BASE3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,331
From: Frederick MD
Default

Originally Posted by relisys190' date='Apr 11 2003, 06:02 PM
This is somewhat but would a N/A FD be slow?



anyone ever run their FD without their turbo's bolted on?
Only one I know of is a circuit car. It's a yellow FD. Completely gutted, tube frame (I think) and a N/A 13b REW. I'll see if I can find pics.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 AM.