Scc Fd Buyers Guide
02-04-2003, 09:52 AM
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Washington
Posts: 148
Originally Posted by JimmyJimboJet' date='Feb 3 2003, 07:50 PM
and did you guys catch their little chart of prices? i just wish those were actually right.
Sivart_R1
02-04-2003, 10:22 PM
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 3,269
Yea I have that one..
Very nice ..
You can go here to read all the instalments of their project RX7...http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/projectcars/
Very nice ..
You can go here to read all the instalments of their project RX7...http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/projectcars/
02-05-2003, 08:23 AM
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Due to global Warming, the new hot spot.........Canada
Posts: 1,211
Quote
"Cars equipped with sunroofs were steel rather then glass. which was previously used"
That is what was said in the "year-to-year changes" part of the artical, for the differences between the 93 and 94.
Now correct me if im wrong(and the mag is right), but should it not be the other way around.
That the cars equipped with sunroofs would be glass, and the steel is what was previously used??
shawn
"Cars equipped with sunroofs were steel rather then glass. which was previously used"
That is what was said in the "year-to-year changes" part of the artical, for the differences between the 93 and 94.
Now correct me if im wrong(and the mag is right), but should it not be the other way around.
That the cars equipped with sunroofs would be glass, and the steel is what was previously used??
shawn
02-05-2003, 09:09 AM
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 3,269
"Cars equipped with sunroofs were steel rather then glass. which was previously used"
That is what was said in the "year-to-year changes" part of the artical, for the differences between the 93 and 94.
Now correct me if im wrong(and the mag is right), but should it not be the other way around.
That the cars equipped with sunroofs would be glass, and the steel is what was previously used??
shawn
That is what was said in the "year-to-year changes" part of the artical, for the differences between the 93 and 94.
Now correct me if im wrong(and the mag is right), but should it not be the other way around.
That the cars equipped with sunroofs would be glass, and the steel is what was previously used??
shawn
02-05-2003, 05:06 PM
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Due to global Warming, the new hot spot.........Canada
Posts: 1,211
Originally Posted by rx7machine' date='Feb 5 2003, 07:09 AM
"Cars equipped with sunroofs were steel rather then glass. which was previously used"
That is what was said in the "year-to-year changes" part of the artical, for the differences between the 93 and 94.
Now correct me if im wrong(and the mag is right), but should it not be the other way around.
That the cars equipped with sunroofs would be glass, and the steel is what was previously used??
shawn
That is what was said in the "year-to-year changes" part of the artical, for the differences between the 93 and 94.
Now correct me if im wrong(and the mag is right), but should it not be the other way around.
That the cars equipped with sunroofs would be glass, and the steel is what was previously used??
shawn
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)