3rd Generation Specific Talk about 3rd gen RX-7's here.

Scc Fd Buyers Guide

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 09:52 AM
  #11  
Sivart_R1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 148
From: Washington
Default

Originally Posted by JimmyJimboJet' date='Feb 3 2003, 07:50 PM
and did you guys catch their little chart of prices? i just wish those were actually right.
I wonder where they got those prices from, personally. I've watched the Kelly Blue book value on my car over the years, and the numbers they show are off by quite a bit.



Sivart_R1
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 12:52 PM
  #12  
93 R1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,867
From: Maryland
Default

They fucked up the boost pattern too. It said something like 10psi till 4500 then 8psi till redline. Close but no cigar
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 02:02 PM
  #13  
9BASE3's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,331
From: Frederick MD
Default

Originally Posted by 93 R1' date='Feb 4 2003, 12:52 PM
They fucked up the boost pattern too. It said something like 10psi till 4500 then 8psi till redline. Close but no cigar
LMAO!
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 07:35 PM
  #14  
IllicitPerformance's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3
Default

The pricing guide sucks too. Way off market price.
Old Feb 4, 2003 | 10:22 PM
  #15  
rx7machine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,269
From: NC
Default

Yea I have that one..

Very nice ..

You can go here to read all the instalments of their project RX7...http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/projectcars/
Good site.
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 08:23 AM
  #16  
Mazdabation's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,211
From: Due to global Warming, the new hot spot.........Canada
Default

Quote

"Cars equipped with sunroofs were steel rather then glass. which was previously used"



That is what was said in the "year-to-year changes" part of the artical, for the differences between the 93 and 94.

Now correct me if im wrong(and the mag is right), but should it not be the other way around.

That the cars equipped with sunroofs would be glass, and the steel is what was previously used??



shawn
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 09:09 AM
  #17  
rx7machine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,269
From: NC
Default

"Cars equipped with sunroofs were steel rather then glass. which was previously used"



That is what was said in the "year-to-year changes" part of the artical, for the differences between the 93 and 94.

Now correct me if im wrong(and the mag is right), but should it not be the other way around.

That the cars equipped with sunroofs would be glass, and the steel is what was previously used??



shawn
From what I understand.. the 93's had the steel sunroofs, then in '94, they changed to glass..
Old Feb 5, 2003 | 05:06 PM
  #18  
Mazdabation's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,211
From: Due to global Warming, the new hot spot.........Canada
Default

Originally Posted by rx7machine' date='Feb 5 2003, 07:09 AM
"Cars equipped with sunroofs were steel rather then glass. which was previously used"



That is what was said in the "year-to-year changes" part of the artical, for the differences between the 93 and 94.

Now correct me if im wrong(and the mag is right), but should it not be the other way around.

That the cars equipped with sunroofs would be glass, and the steel is what was previously used??



shawn
From what I understand.. the 93's had the steel sunroofs, then in '94, they changed to glass..
Thats what I am saying.........so another point off SCC for not doing their proper home work.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
phinsup
Insert BS here
3
Mar 25, 2009 01:33 PM
street_ruler
3rd Generation Specific
1
May 26, 2007 01:01 PM
jdp3253
MRCCFL Forums
1
Jan 1, 2005 12:11 AM
Rx7aholic
3rd Generation Specific
0
Dec 17, 2003 10:32 PM
Red Suns
2nd Gen F.A.Q.'s
0
Apr 14, 2003 11:53 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 AM.