Non-seqential

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

09-29-2003, 04:02 PM

Triniwarrior31

Senior Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 356

Why is this better?

09-29-2003, 04:12 PM

9BASE3

Senior Member

Join Date: Feb 2002

Location: Frederick MD

Posts: 6,331

It's not really. It's personal preference. It's more reliable as you can remove lots of crap from the system, and there is less margin for error. Boost is steady and there is no transition. But it's not "better" per say..

09-29-2003, 04:15 PM

Dumbrotorkid

Senior Member

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 1,713

im gonna have to go with 93 on this one its all personal preference. thats kinda like askin why is doin it doggystyle better than missionary? heh

09-29-2003, 04:22 PM

9BASE3

Senior Member

Join Date: Feb 2002

Location: Frederick MD

Posts: 6,331

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dumbrotorkid' date='Sep 29 2003, 03:15 PM

thats kinda like askin why is doin it doggystyle better than missionary? heh

LMAO!!!

09-29-2003, 05:15 PM

FikseRxSeven

Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2003

Location: union, new jersey

Posts: 8,079

you'll get instant power with the sequential setup.....

the non sequential is easier on your turbos.... incase you wanna boost more

09-29-2003, 05:27 PM

Triniwarrior31

Senior Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: Sep 2003

Posts: 356

I also have another question. You know how you hear these people saying how they changed thier boost and all that, does that require a single turbo or can you change the boost of your stock turbos? (and also) if your car is non seq. does that have any impact on perfomance in general?

Thanks for your time.