3rd Generation Specific Talk about 3rd gen RX-7's here.

Bnr Turbo Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2003, 01:26 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Srce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 5,547
Default

Originally Posted by jspecracer7' date='Jun 4 2003, 11:33 PM
I LOVE BEING SINGLE!!!... no other feeling of the wastegate cracking and your *** end sliding around on 275 Nitto 555R's...
At 50 miles per hour, LOL, you car is loud as ****. Don't lie, I've seen the vid of the JIC. HAHA
Srce is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 03:36 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Goodfellafd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Morristown NJ
Posts: 252
Talking

Originally Posted by SENNALIVES' date='Jun 4 2003, 07:50 AM
Reality check, check around first, I hear of lots of failuers with the BNR's . I have and will soon remove my Stage II's . I did put down 320rw on a seq. ( 13psi) set up, but they are eating up oil like crazy. I wont say who I purchased these from but they told me they are getting most of the BNR's back for repair . If you have some money to spare and alot of patience go for it.
You hear of alot of repairs? I deal with quantifiable facts. Who is having problems, and why? My Stage IIIs were consuming oil by burning it out the tailpipe, a problem easily remedied when Brian sent me a pair of modified oil feed line banjo bolts. This decreased the oil pressure on my feed line and solved my problem. How exactly are your stage IIs consuming oil? Are you sure it's to be blamed on the turbos? Who installed the turbos? You're not telling us the whole story.
Goodfellafd3s is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 05:27 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
Fd3BOOST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: La Plata, Maryland
Posts: 9,725
Default

Not to go beating a dead horse Rich but Rikki threw down the same numbers on stock twins as you may remember.

Actually to be exact he did 368 on 11psi. Thats not to say that your set up is not money cause it sounds like it is. I'm just saying B&R's are not the only way to get there using twins.



I never payed much attention to the whole B&R thing, what do they cost?
Fd3BOOST is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 05:52 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Goodfellafd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Morristown NJ
Posts: 252
Default

Originally Posted by Fd3BOOST' date='Jun 5 2003, 02:27 AM
Not to go beating a dead horse Rich but Rikki threw down the same numbers on stock twins as you may remember.

Actually to be exact he did 368 on 11psi. Thats not to say that your set up is not money cause it sounds like it is. I'm just saying B&R's are not the only way to get there using twins.



I never payed much attention to the whole B&R thing, what do they cost?
Hi Dave,



if you look more closely at my sig you'll see that the 368 number came on the stock twins (with over 90k miles on them) and with a high flow cat.



Rich
Goodfellafd3s is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 06:29 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Fd3BOOST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: La Plata, Maryland
Posts: 9,725
Default

Originally Posted by Goodfellafd3s' date='Jun 5 2003, 02:52 AM
[quote name='Fd3BOOST' date='Jun 5 2003, 02:27 AM'] Not to go beating a dead horse Rich but Rikki threw down the same numbers on stock twins as you may remember.

Actually to be exact he did 368 on 11psi. Thats not to say that your set up is not money cause it sounds like it is. I'm just saying B&R's are not the only way to get there using twins.



I never payed much attention to the whole B&R thing, what do they cost?
Hi Dave,



if you look more closely at my sig you'll see that the 368 number came on the stock twins (with over 90k miles on them) and with a high flow cat.



Rich [/quote]

OK, so what are the B&R's doing? Any dyno numbers or at least guesstimites?
Fd3BOOST is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 07:50 AM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
r_xplicit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: jackson, ms
Posts: 1,305
Default

i saw numbers on the "other" forum that were in the 459 range........to the wheels......18-20 psi
r_xplicit is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 10:48 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
9BASE3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Frederick MD
Posts: 6,331
Default

Originally Posted by r_xplicit' date='Jun 5 2003, 06:50 AM
i saw numbers on the "other" forum that were in the 459 range........to the wheels......18-20 psi
9BASE3 is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 02:47 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
teknics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,837
Default

just ask SPOAuto he's running 400+hp with the bnr stage 3's, and IIRC his arent even the final version his are still the guinea pig version.



kevin
teknics is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 01:17 AM
  #29  
Member
 
zooq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 70
Default

Originally Posted by r_xplicit' date='Jun 5 2003, 04:50 AM
i saw numbers on the "other" forum that were in the 459 range........to the wheels......18-20 psi
the 459 was crank HP. the car made close to 400ish whp i think. thats what Steve Kan told me.
zooq is offline  
Old 06-06-2003, 09:53 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
jackdhammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Oxnard, CA.
Posts: 283
Default

He, he, he.......he said crank........



No seriously, what can a person expect on a stock motor running 10-13lbs of boost? I wish I had the $$$$ to run 20+lbs of boost and just buy a new motor when one pops, but I don't and I don't think many do. Given all the negatives of the twins in the twin vs. single debate it would have to be pretty decent to match the long term (and instant) bonus that comes with going single. I ask because I looked for a hot minute at the BNR's but I always see them running at 15+lbs and have never heard anything positive about the long term (1year+) stability of them.
jackdhammer is offline  


Quick Reply: Bnr Turbo Question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:03 AM.