Why Are S4's Faster?
01-15-2003, 01:43 PM
#31
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 17,839
Originally Posted by FCmaniac' date='Jan 15 2003, 01:25 PM
That's great for drag radials. I don't see why the slicks wouldn't get you sub 1.5 60's... providing the diff and axles can handle it!
diff and axles are upgraded. the car will be drag raced but not twice a week like i have been doing lol
01-15-2003, 04:17 PM
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 10,906
Originally Posted by vosko' date='Jan 15 2003, 12:15 PM
that doesn't make sense though. a FD has 255 hp and does 0-60 in 5.2 and the 1/4 in 13.0-13.5
oh well what i do know
i only timed my FD and my TII LOL
oh well what i do know
i only timed my FD and my TII LOL
01-15-2003, 04:27 PM
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New Jersey YO!
Posts: 458
Originally Posted by 1Revvin7' date='Jan 15 2003, 10:17 PM
I know why, cuz that **** in magazine is BULLSHIT!!!! they probably had some drag racer PRO driver do that fc time, im postive, and yes it was bone stock.
01-15-2003, 09:32 PM
#37
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 282
I don't rust road and track. Motor trend is my source. It seems that, generally, road and track is slower, but a couple cars are faster than motor trend. I think they are biased. They had a Mustang Cobra beat a ZO6, and that's just wrong. According to everywhere else, a ZO6 would kill a mustang Cobra.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)