2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

Timing

Old Jun 18, 2004 | 08:10 PM
  #1  
threcixty's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 68
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Just wondering how accurate the timing pointer is on the front cover of a S5 n/a. The reason I ask is that when I time my car correctly, I get bucking under light acceleration and a wierd sounding idle. If I advance the timing about a eighth to a quarter of an inch, this problem goes away and my car behaves much better, but I am worried about pinging the engine. Just wondering if there is any way to check this.

Thanks!
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 08:32 PM
  #2  
Rob x-7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,288
From: Amityville, New York
Default

the pointers are accurate, someone may have at one time

put the crank angle sensor in a tiny bit off, or it could

be something else causing the bucking



just leave it where it runs right
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 01:19 AM
  #3  
1Revvin7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,906
From: Peoria, AZ
Default

The pulley can be off by 1 deg, there is play in the bolts that hold it together. The cas can be off by 3 degs. A little advance on an n/a is ok.
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 12:50 PM
  #4  
threcixty's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 68
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

cool.. I guess as long as it doesn't ping, it is ok. Is there any gains from advancing the timing on an n/a?? If so, how far can you go? Thanks for the help guys!!
Old Jun 19, 2004 | 12:57 PM
  #5  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

yes you do gain from advancing the timing on an na. generally you can keep going until you loose power or start to ping
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 12:22 AM
  #6  
DriftSeshRx7's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 17
From: fort wayne indiana
Default

good luck getting your car to ping with an all stock fuel system , i can run mine almost full lean on the rich lean adjustment and my timing almost all the way advanced, i can get it to hesitate top end but not to ping.
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 12:53 AM
  #7  
Sesshoumaru's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 75
Default

sounds like a miss adjusted tps
Old Jun 20, 2004 | 10:55 AM
  #8  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by DriftSeshRx7' date='Jun 19 2004, 09:22 PM
good luck getting your car to ping with an all stock fuel system , i can run mine almost full lean on the rich lean adjustment and my timing almost all the way advanced, i can get it to hesitate top end but not to ping.
that rich lean adjuster only adjusts idle, when the tps moves from 0 that thing doesnt work anymore
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 11:51 AM
  #9  
threcixty's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 68
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Ok, so this might be a dumb question, but if I advance it until it pings, won't I break an apex?? The TPS was off a little, but by advancing the timing over stock, lets say about 1/4" (3-5 degrees??) the hesitation goes away and the car doesnt buck at all. Something else that is wierd, I am getting about 28-30 mpg on a large SP with headers and an intake on a 91 engine. AND it is fast.. go figure
Old Jun 21, 2004 | 12:03 PM
  #10  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by threcixty' date='Jun 21 2004, 08:51 AM
Ok, so this might be a dumb question, but if I advance it until it pings, won't I break an apex?? The TPS was off a little, but by advancing the timing over stock, lets say about 1/4" (3-5 degrees??) the hesitation goes away and the car doesnt buck at all. Something else that is wierd, I am getting about 28-30 mpg on a large SP with headers and an intake on a 91 engine. AND it is fast.. go figure
the sp is prolly causing the bucking, s5 efi doesnt like mods



pinging on an na wont break the seals right away

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 PM.