2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion
View Poll Results: Which is better?
supercharger
24.18%
turbo
73.63%
none
2.20%
Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll

Supercharged or Turbocharged

Old May 16, 2007 | 03:03 AM
  #41  
anewconvert's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 14
Default

Originally Posted by turborotor' post='871461' date='May 11 2007, 02:35 PM

Who is still making supercharger kits like Nelson used to have for the FC?



Would like to doe something like that for the vert. and when time comes to smog. just take it out. That's the only + thing I like about sc and the instant torque so i can make a heavy car take off the line a little better.




I think the only people still making a S/C kit for the 13b is camden.





BC
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 08:19 PM
  #42  
Rotary_Engaged's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 143
Default

http://www.camdensuperchargers.com/



There you go. S/C complements the rotary power band.
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 08:25 PM
  #43  
TopGunn's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 8
Default

To beat out everyone's arguments; twincharge your rotary.
Old Jun 9, 2009 | 09:22 PM
  #44  
RotorDad's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 167
From: fredericksburg, va
Default

since i have both a turbo rotary & a camden roots charged rotary, not to mention i have driven a paxton/nelson rotary. it all comes down to the owners preference and driving style. what will the car need to do will determine the route to go. have fun in what ever way you decide
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FD3Smaniac
2nd Generation Specific
7
May 16, 2007 10:51 PM
Indian
Kills
42
Jan 26, 2004 12:19 AM
SuperchargedRex
RX-7 & RX-8 For Sale
10
Dec 7, 2002 10:25 PM
blown4
RX-7 & RX-8 For Sale
1
Oct 11, 2002 08:06 AM
88rx7
2nd Generation Specific
1
Nov 25, 2001 09:54 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 PM.