2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

S4 S5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 02:55 PM
  #11  
RONIN FC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,420
From: Boston Ma.
Default

Originally Posted by rx7kid2gtt' date='Jan 13 2004, 12:42 PM
ok you that the 13bt is a smaller engine.
No, i may have said that in a way that could be easily be misunderstood. The "13" in 13b means the displacement of 1300 cc. I really meant the engine *changes* between S4 and S5 turbo II are small.
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 02:58 PM
  #12  
RONIN FC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,420
From: Boston Ma.
Default

Originally Posted by rx7kid2gtt' date='Jan 13 2004, 12:54 PM
so what is the power gans with the Ss. and y is there elctonics
About 15 HP gain, both turbo and N/A. Technology got better, so did the cars electronics.
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 03:02 PM
  #13  
rx7kid2gtt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 98
From: netcong nj
Post

thanks for all the posts.

if you all want to leave me with more info about then i would love it.
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 03:11 PM
  #14  
Baldy's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,425
From: Tallahassee, FL
Default

I believe the S5 rotors were lighter, which is part of the reason for more power over the S4. I've also read that the S5's were slightly heavier (the whole car, not just the engine).
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 06:00 PM
  #15  
FCmaniac's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,801
From: Eastern PA
Default

S4 NA = 146 bhp

S4 T2 = 182 bhp

S5 NA = 160 bhp

S5 T2 = 200 bhp



Those are the stock ratings from Mazda. Higher compression, lighter rotors and a different intake manifold design along with a different auxillary 5/6 port actuation are the main reasons for the NA power increase. The T2's I believe had a different compression ratio too and a bit more boost for the power increase.



Like Phins said, some electrical changes in engine from S4 to S5 were from mechanical to electric oil metering pump (this is what lubricates the inside of our engines), different throttle position sensor (I think dual position instead of the single plunger TPS from S4) and mass air flow sensor went from the flapper door type to whatever the S5 is... I cant remember anything else.
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 07:24 PM
  #16  
RONIN FC's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,420
From: Boston Ma.
Default

The S5 intake plenum was also improved with VDI (Variable Dynamic Intake, I think it is).



S5 TII compression ratio 9.0



S4 TII compression ratio 8.5



S5 6pi (6 port-N/A) compression ratio 9.7



S4 6pi (6 port-N/A) compression ratio 9.4
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 07:29 PM
  #17  
Rob x-7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,288
From: Amityville, New York
Default

im trying to figure out why rx7kid reported this thread?
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 08:05 PM
  #18  
FCmaniac's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,801
From: Eastern PA
Default

reported it? WTF? he sounded pretty damn pleased with the help he was getting
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 08:13 PM
  #19  
Rob x-7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,288
From: Amityville, New York
Default

i think he got confused and reported it
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 08:39 PM
  #20  
Apex13B's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,679
From: Colorado Springs
Default

no your just a bastid rob lol. this poor guy sounds confused. The ECU in jeff's (DJ Blu) 88 T2 is about 2 times the size of mine. The turbo in the S4/S5 cars are different, the injectors, the pulse dampener (no more fire), the wastegate is slightly larger (.5mm i believe) and works better.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:21 AM.