2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

S4 S5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2004, 02:55 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
RONIN FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Boston Ma.
Posts: 1,420
Default

Originally Posted by rx7kid2gtt' date='Jan 13 2004, 12:42 PM
ok you that the 13bt is a smaller engine.
No, i may have said that in a way that could be easily be misunderstood. The "13" in 13b means the displacement of 1300 cc. I really meant the engine *changes* between S4 and S5 turbo II are small.
RONIN FC is offline  
Old 01-13-2004, 02:58 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
RONIN FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Boston Ma.
Posts: 1,420
Default

Originally Posted by rx7kid2gtt' date='Jan 13 2004, 12:54 PM
so what is the power gans with the Ss. and y is there elctonics
About 15 HP gain, both turbo and N/A. Technology got better, so did the cars electronics.
RONIN FC is offline  
Old 01-13-2004, 03:02 PM
  #13  
Member
Thread Starter
 
rx7kid2gtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: netcong nj
Posts: 98
Post

thanks for all the posts.

if you all want to leave me with more info about then i would love it.
rx7kid2gtt is offline  
Old 01-13-2004, 03:11 PM
  #14  
Super Moderator
 
Baldy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 5,425
Default

I believe the S5 rotors were lighter, which is part of the reason for more power over the S4. I've also read that the S5's were slightly heavier (the whole car, not just the engine).
Baldy is offline  
Old 01-13-2004, 06:00 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
FCmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 1,801
Default

S4 NA = 146 bhp

S4 T2 = 182 bhp

S5 NA = 160 bhp

S5 T2 = 200 bhp



Those are the stock ratings from Mazda. Higher compression, lighter rotors and a different intake manifold design along with a different auxillary 5/6 port actuation are the main reasons for the NA power increase. The T2's I believe had a different compression ratio too and a bit more boost for the power increase.



Like Phins said, some electrical changes in engine from S4 to S5 were from mechanical to electric oil metering pump (this is what lubricates the inside of our engines), different throttle position sensor (I think dual position instead of the single plunger TPS from S4) and mass air flow sensor went from the flapper door type to whatever the S5 is... I cant remember anything else.
FCmaniac is offline  
Old 01-13-2004, 07:24 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
RONIN FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Boston Ma.
Posts: 1,420
Default

The S5 intake plenum was also improved with VDI (Variable Dynamic Intake, I think it is).



S5 TII compression ratio 9.0



S4 TII compression ratio 8.5



S5 6pi (6 port-N/A) compression ratio 9.7



S4 6pi (6 port-N/A) compression ratio 9.4
RONIN FC is offline  
Old 01-13-2004, 07:29 PM
  #17  
Super Moderator
 
Rob x-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Amityville, New York
Posts: 12,288
Default

im trying to figure out why rx7kid reported this thread?
Rob x-7 is offline  
Old 01-13-2004, 08:05 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
FCmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 1,801
Default

reported it? WTF? he sounded pretty damn pleased with the help he was getting
FCmaniac is offline  
Old 01-13-2004, 08:13 PM
  #19  
Super Moderator
 
Rob x-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Amityville, New York
Posts: 12,288
Default

i think he got confused and reported it
Rob x-7 is offline  
Old 01-13-2004, 08:39 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
Apex13B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 1,679
Default

no your just a bastid rob lol. this poor guy sounds confused. The ECU in jeff's (DJ Blu) 88 T2 is about 2 times the size of mine. The turbo in the S4/S5 cars are different, the injectors, the pulse dampener (no more fire), the wastegate is slightly larger (.5mm i believe) and works better.
Apex13B is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:13 AM.