2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

S-afc I What Do You Guys Think?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2003, 03:25 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Roy James's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Augusta GA
Posts: 16
Default

Im thinking about getting the first gen S-AFC instead of the flashy expensive digi one everyone else has. You guys know what im talking about the one with the *****. One can usually acquire one for under or around 100 bucks, what do you guys think about them? Thanks
Roy James is offline  
Old 05-25-2003, 01:06 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
kahren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 1,345
Default

those dont have the low and high fuel map, so its not as good as the funky newer ones

and if u are wondering how much power u can gain from tunning your car with an afc i have a sample



this is on a NA btw



http://12.243.159.121/cars/dyno%20files/FC...C/NA/ported.JPG
kahren is offline  
Old 05-25-2003, 01:28 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
FCmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 1,801
Default

I have the cheapo first gen safc but I didnt get it in yet..



Kahren, that's impressive, do you have any fuel mods on the NA? Were those gains from the SAFC adjustment only?
FCmaniac is offline  
Old 05-25-2003, 01:46 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
kahren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: CT
Posts: 1,345
Default

safc only, na fuel system is good for about 220 at wheels with a .55 BSFC

the stock car runs really rich u can lean it out, and get a bunch of power,

i am still runnign safely rich i can lean out more, but i use 87 octane gas the

timing is slightly retarded and thats why i didnt lean out the car.



this is on a 91 NA, with full RB exhaust and mild street port, the street port

realyl doesnt do **** untill u get some real intak manifolds, teh stock ones are just

way too long and narrow to complement the port.



i am only gettign maybe like 5 more whp then same car without a port.

but the gains still good for the stock car, u can get about 10 whp just by leaning

it out on a completely stock car
kahren is offline  
Old 05-25-2003, 10:08 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
FCmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eastern PA
Posts: 1,801
Default

Originally Posted by kahren' date='May 25 2003, 02:46 AM
safc only, na fuel system is good for about 220 at wheels with a .55 BSFC

the stock car runs really rich u can lean it out, and get a bunch of power,

i am still runnign safely rich i can lean out more, but i use 87 octane gas the

timing is slightly retarded and thats why i didnt lean out the car.



this is on a 91 NA, with full RB exhaust and mild street port, the street port

realyl doesnt do **** untill u get some real intak manifolds, teh stock ones are just

way too long and narrow to complement the port.



i am only gettign maybe like 5 more whp then same car without a port.

but the gains still good for the stock car, u can get about 10 whp just by leaning

it out on a completely stock car
I dont have a streetport but I did port the TB, match the manifolds, and put in the pineapple inserts.. I noticed now that the power band seemed to shift higher up.. I lost some low end but it is pulling much better now from 6-8k. I need to get the safc in and get it tuned if you say its worth it (which it looks like it is).



Thanks for the info.
FCmaniac is offline  
Old 05-25-2003, 12:13 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Default

k2rd dyno'ed thier its car (stock s5 motor, with cone filter and exhaust, big big exhaust) and the air fuel ratio was in the 10's, it would make a bunch more power leaning it out



mike
j9fd3s is offline  
Old 05-25-2003, 01:52 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Roy James's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Augusta GA
Posts: 16
Default

Holy **** in the 10s?!?! Thats like richer than a turbo car should need. Dont turbos run good at something like 11.5:1 and thats even with a good saftey margin? Anyways, thanks for the info guys, i might get it, i might just save up another hundred or so and get the second gen. What i really want is a cheap DIY Stand alone, anyone heard of "megasquirt" and if thats any good? Thanks guys. Hell... i might get crazy and slap an evil snail on the side of this motor, who knows,
Roy James is offline  
Old 05-27-2003, 01:28 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
CrazyAssRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 328
Default

did you adjust the S AFC your self or did you ahve somebody do it?



how much doees it cost for someone to tune it up real good???

i want to get one but i waant to have everything perfect
CrazyAssRX7 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Turbo II
Insert BS here
5
08-15-2002 05:07 PM
Fluke_SDS
Insert BS here
17
07-31-2002 10:09 PM
treceb
2nd Generation Specific
2
05-08-2002 11:19 AM
treceb
Insert BS here
8
03-19-2002 01:18 PM
treceb
TRI7
5
01-17-2002 02:17 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: S-afc I What Do You Guys Think?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 PM.