2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

the rule of three

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2006, 09:51 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Default

well put the safc in there, its better than nothing
j9fd3s is offline  
Old 04-03-2006, 10:55 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
cdaleracer669's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: pueblo, colorado
Posts: 193
Default

ive only seen a 3 mod rule mentioned for a 3rd gen. you could nearly do a turbo conversion for the price of a standalone ECU. NEARLY
cdaleracer669 is offline  
Old 04-05-2006, 05:54 PM
  #13  
Junior Member
 
Hellkat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 8
Default

Unless your going for the ultimate 300 hp N/A FC. Standalone is a waste of money IMHO. Safc is fine with the mods you have. In all aspects standalone isnt worth it. Remember, once you buy the standalone your gunna need to tune it which will cost more money if ur gunna do it right.
Hellkat is offline  
Old 04-05-2006, 09:10 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Default

Originally Posted by Hellkat' post='812264' date='Apr 5 2006, 03:54 PM

Unless your going for the ultimate 300 hp N/A FC. Standalone is a waste of money IMHO. Safc is fine with the mods you have. In all aspects standalone isnt worth it. Remember, once you buy the standalone your gunna need to tune it which will cost more money if ur gunna do it right.


we gained something like 15-20lbs feet between 4-6k rpms, and an extra 1000rpms of peak power by going from a stock ecu to an e6x, on a stock port s5 motor, only mods were headers, and no 6 ports
j9fd3s is offline  
Old 04-05-2006, 09:44 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
rowtareh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbia IL/St. Louis MO
Posts: 2,748
Default

it's not the fact that you gain power from a different ecu, but just the fact that the ecu in the fcs are between 15-20 years old. not to mention the brittle out of date wiring harness. plus the fact you don't have to deal with if you want to have streetported or bridgeported engine thrown into the car later on down the road.



and whoever can do a turbo swap for the price of a standalone, tell me where to sign up. because I just can't even see that happen.
rowtareh is offline  
Old 04-05-2006, 10:34 PM
  #16  
Junior Member
 
Hellkat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 8
Default

uhh i know of several jdm motor dealers with turbo swaps for less then 1k, i bought mine for 900 shipping came to 400 so 1300 for a long block. ecu, harness and other misc stuff is cheap if you get off forum members.



As for the labor part? Just find a rotorhead near you willing to help out. If not do like what i did and just research ALOT and DIY. If you run into trouble there is always lookups on the forums.
Hellkat is offline  
Old 04-05-2006, 10:36 PM
  #17  
Junior Member
 
Hellkat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 8
Default

But all in all people, i think he is just really asking if he NEEDS it if he starts modding his engine. ATM it looks like he is running stock with bolt ons so in my opinion he doesnt.
Hellkat is offline  
Old 04-06-2006, 09:12 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
rowtareh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbia IL/St. Louis MO
Posts: 2,748
Default

Originally Posted by Hellkat' post='812349' date='Apr 5 2006, 11:34 PM

uhh i know of several jdm motor dealers with turbo swaps for less then 1k, i bought mine for 900 shipping came to 400 so 1300 for a long block. ecu, harness and other misc stuff is cheap if you get off forum members.



As for the labor part? Just find a rotorhead near you willing to help out. If not do like what i did and just research ALOT and DIY. If you run into trouble there is always lookups on the forums.




Hmmm, yeah. And what do you think will happen to that J-spec 13bt in about 10-12k miles? POP!!! Those engines were not treated nicely I can tell you that.



And you can find a Haltech for under 1k, Power FC is around 1100-1200, maybe even less.



I am not doubting you at all, just having a discussion.



And yes, he does NOT need a standalone with simple bolt ons, but it would be nice to have, just for simplicity.
rowtareh is offline  
Old 04-07-2006, 09:03 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
teknics's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,837
Default

plain and simple:



a standalone will always be able to squeeze more out of a car then the stock ecu. it will also allow you to run safely and monitor systems closely.

a standalone is one of THE best investments for ANY vehicle.

A stock ecu is programmed so conservatively that its ridiculous. especially rotaries.



sure if you want to be "the typical fc owner" then cheap it around till the whole thing implodes and then blame it on the car.



To answer your question directly, no you dont *need* a standalone, but the chances of your car suffering from lack of a standalone is high. Having a tunable computer is 1000x better then a stock ecu. EVen just running an RTek or something would be fine. But a system like Wolf or Haltech lets you replace your wiring harness which helps prevent little shorts in your 15 year old stock harness from causing you headaches.



doing it right always pays off.

go ahead and flame me BTW havent had that happen in a while, some disinformation floating through this thread, disinformation + newbie isn't good. give this guy proper advice, sheesh.

kevin.
teknics is offline  
Old 04-08-2006, 07:33 AM
  #20  
Member
Thread Starter
 
puppyslaughter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 64
Default

thanks for the help guys i have been playing with fd's alot and i am just now getting into fc's and slowly finding out that though the cars are simalar there is a world of diffrence between them thanks
puppyslaughter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
P'cola FD
Insert BS here
42
11-06-2002 11:30 AM
Racer X
Australian Forum
1
10-19-2002 06:09 AM
Jims5543
Race Prep
4
09-24-2002 09:25 PM
swansun
Insert BS here
22
05-03-2002 03:29 PM
Rotormotor
Insert BS here
5
02-21-2002 07:12 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: the rule of three



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 AM.