2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

Ran The 1/4 Again...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-06-2003, 09:46 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
rotary>piston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 282
Default

top of the stock guage is about 7.5 psi or so.
rotary>piston is offline  
Old 05-07-2003, 01:37 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
ILUVMY88CABRIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 3,097
Default

A stock TII should run the 1/4 in low 15s high 14s. With your mods you should be in the 14s easily. The SAFC is easy to install and use. There are only 7 wires to hook up (maybe more with the SAFC II), and you can adjust it in 1000 rpm increments, not 500. What rpm were you launching at? When I ran my 13.2, I launched at about 5000 rpm. And the 40 on the stock boost gauge is 7.735 psi, but that doesn't do you any good because you have a FCD so your stock gauge is off.
ILUVMY88CABRIO is offline  
Old 05-07-2003, 01:48 AM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
RX7Aggie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NASA/JSC - Clear Lake, TX
Posts: 870
Default

Originally Posted by UniqueTII' date='May 6 2003, 11:00 AM
That's a contradiction. If your WG is ported, your boost doesn't creep. I have a full exhaust and intake and I rarely go over 6psi.
diddo. i have full exhaust and intake and i'm lucky to creep above 7 psi on my autometer guage in 1st under full trottle. although, i dont have a ported wastegate.



i also did a conversion on my quality TI-89, 400 mmHg = 7.73 psi.
RX7Aggie is offline  
Old 05-07-2003, 02:47 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
ILUVMY88CABRIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 3,097
Default

I used... http://www.maribi.com/conversion/pressured...edifference.htm
ILUVMY88CABRIO is offline  
Old 05-08-2003, 12:25 PM
  #25  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
1988RedT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 2,532
Default

Here's the timeslip info. My scanner is still in a box since I moved. I'm on the left. Right lane was a GM V-8 in some mid-80's Cutlass or Malibu or something.



0.8470 --- REACTION --- 0.9431

2.4409 --- 60 FT --- 2.1996

10.2162 --- 1/8 ET --- 9.7116

71.99 --- 1/8 MPH --- 72.41

15.5695 --- 1/4 ET --- 15.1945

92.08 --- 1/4 MPH --- 89.95
1988RedT2 is offline  
Old 05-08-2003, 12:34 PM
  #26  
Senior Member
 
FikseRxSeven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: union, new jersey
Posts: 8,079
Default

i agree with getting fd wheels........ they're not expensive and very very light
FikseRxSeven is offline  
Old 05-08-2003, 02:19 PM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
donhayes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 485
Default

Something has to be wrong w/ the car because my old 88 non turbo MX-6 ran those times at the strip.
donhayes is offline  
Old 05-08-2003, 03:19 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
UniqueTII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 4,773
Default

Originally Posted by donhayes' date='May 8 2003, 02:19 PM
Something has to be wrong w/ the car because my old 88 non turbo MX-6 ran those times at the strip.
Really? What did you have done to it? My '89 MX-6 was pretty slow, especially in comparison to my TII.
UniqueTII is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Twin89Stangs
Insert BS here
15
08-08-2002 02:43 PM
vosko
2nd Generation Specific
14
04-30-2002 11:17 PM
vosko
2nd Generation Specific
9
04-16-2002 08:25 AM
vosko
2nd Generation Specific
8
04-11-2002 08:16 PM
vosko
2nd Generation Specific
32
04-05-2002 01:10 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Ran The 1/4 Again...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 AM.