2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

Just Picked And Opened Up The Gxl Motor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 09:39 AM
  #21  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,763
From: Savannah, Ga
Default

Originally Posted by pengaru' date='Aug 8 2003, 11:58 PM
first and last time? Have you had to replace the ball joints on the front A arms yet?



what is the reason for saying S5's don't like BP?
Because my car runs like **** when I open my 6 ports, which happen to have a small bridge. Im sellign this motor to someone with a S4 as soon as I finish my SP motor. That should be 2-3 weeks at this rate though.
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 01:50 PM
  #22  
pengaru's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,930
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by mazdaspeed7' date='Aug 9 2003, 02:39 PM
[quote name='pengaru' date='Aug 8 2003, 11:58 PM'] first and last time? Have you had to replace the ball joints on the front A arms yet?



what is the reason for saying S5's don't like BP?
Because my car runs like **** when I open my 6 ports, which happen to have a small bridge. Im sellign this motor to someone with a S4 as soon as I finish my SP motor. That should be 2-3 weeks at this rate though. [/quote]

hrm, thats just one specific case, i'm not sure how conclusive that is as far as S5's hating BP's in general.



Are you wiring them open or just opening them at high rpm? safc or anything?
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 02:01 PM
  #23  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,763
From: Savannah, Ga
Default

Originally Posted by pengaru' date='Aug 9 2003, 10:50 AM
[quote name='mazdaspeed7' date='Aug 9 2003, 02:39 PM'] [quote name='pengaru' date='Aug 8 2003, 11:58 PM'] first and last time? Have you had to replace the ball joints on the front A arms yet?



what is the reason for saying S5's don't like BP?
Because my car runs like **** when I open my 6 ports, which happen to have a small bridge. Im sellign this motor to someone with a S4 as soon as I finish my SP motor. That should be 2-3 weeks at this rate though. [/quote]

hrm, thats just one specific case, i'm not sure how conclusive that is as far as S5's hating BP's in general.



Are you wiring them open or just opening them at high rpm? safc or anything? [/quote]

The problem is my afm gets maxed out before it gets into the powerband. S5's seem to have a problem with that. Ive seen small SP motors with bolt ons hitting 95% of the max reading on the afm. A s-afc or wont do any good because the computer isnt mapped for the airflow that a BP uses.



I have my ports wired closed now, running on 4 ports only...
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 03:13 PM
  #24  
pengaru's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,930
From: IL
Default

Originally Posted by mazdaspeed7' date='Aug 9 2003, 07:01 PM
[quote name='pengaru' date='Aug 9 2003, 10:50 AM'] [quote name='mazdaspeed7' date='Aug 9 2003, 02:39 PM'] [quote name='pengaru' date='Aug 8 2003, 11:58 PM'] first and last time? Have you had to replace the ball joints on the front A arms yet?



what is the reason for saying S5's don't like BP?
Because my car runs like **** when I open my 6 ports, which happen to have a small bridge. Im sellign this motor to someone with a S4 as soon as I finish my SP motor. That should be 2-3 weeks at this rate though. [/quote]

hrm, thats just one specific case, i'm not sure how conclusive that is as far as S5's hating BP's in general.



Are you wiring them open or just opening them at high rpm? safc or anything? [/quote]

The problem is my afm gets maxed out before it gets into the powerband. S5's seem to have a problem with that. Ive seen small SP motors with bolt ons hitting 95% of the max reading on the afm. A s-afc or wont do any good because the computer isnt mapped for the airflow that a BP uses.



I have my ports wired closed now, running on 4 ports only... [/quote]

considered afm modifications if it truely is getting maxed out?
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 07:01 PM
  #25  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,763
From: Savannah, Ga
Default

Originally Posted by pengaru' date='Aug 9 2003, 12:13 PM
[quote name='mazdaspeed7' date='Aug 9 2003, 07:01 PM'] [quote name='pengaru' date='Aug 9 2003, 10:50 AM'] [quote name='mazdaspeed7' date='Aug 9 2003, 02:39 PM'] [quote name='pengaru' date='Aug 8 2003, 11:58 PM'] first and last time? Have you had to replace the ball joints on the front A arms yet?



what is the reason for saying S5's don't like BP?
Because my car runs like **** when I open my 6 ports, which happen to have a small bridge. Im sellign this motor to someone with a S4 as soon as I finish my SP motor. That should be 2-3 weeks at this rate though. [/quote]

hrm, thats just one specific case, i'm not sure how conclusive that is as far as S5's hating BP's in general.



Are you wiring them open or just opening them at high rpm? safc or anything? [/quote]

The problem is my afm gets maxed out before it gets into the powerband. S5's seem to have a problem with that. Ive seen small SP motors with bolt ons hitting 95% of the max reading on the afm. A s-afc or wont do any good because the computer isnt mapped for the airflow that a BP uses.



I have my ports wired closed now, running on 4 ports only... [/quote]

considered afm modifications if it truely is getting maxed out? [/quote]

You cant modify S5 afm's
Old Aug 9, 2003 | 09:36 PM
  #26  
vosko's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,839
From: NJ
Default

well that is a problem with S5 ECU/AFM not the engine time to go haltech
Old Aug 31, 2003 | 05:05 PM
  #27  
j200pruf's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 448
From: Portland Oregon
Default

MS, what do you think about using that BPed motor with a ECO/Manifold set-up like Pengaru? IDA might be better but the DCOE would allow you to have good low RPM since it still has port actuarotrs.

Sorry for digging this up.
Old Aug 31, 2003 | 05:08 PM
  #28  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,763
From: Savannah, Ga
Default

I dont think it will work very well. The runner will be a problem. You have 2 ports, and DRASTICALLY different port timings sharing the same runner. The seperate pulses are going to interfere with each other in the runner, and reduce power, and I expect thats one of the main reasons my car ran like **** with the aux ports open.



I think to pull it off, you will need 6 seperate runners, and no less than 3 throttle bodies.



It would be simpler and make more power to take a 4 port, half bridge it, and set it up so the secondary ports open after a certain rpm.
Old Aug 31, 2003 | 07:05 PM
  #29  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

why dont you put an s4 afm into it? its compatible



mike
Old Aug 31, 2003 | 09:54 PM
  #30  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,763
From: Savannah, Ga
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Aug 31 2003, 04:05 PM
why dont you put an s4 afm into it? its compatible



mike
First, I just dont care that much. Motors sold anyways, just waiting for the guy to collect the money. And my new motor is almost ready to go together. Second, I think the problem with the runners is more serious than the AFM.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:13 AM.