I've Created Another 6 Port Bridgeport Monster
05-24-2004, 02:38 AM
#45
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15
is there any update on this? i tried PM'ing Ito, but his box is full. i need some info about this before BDC starts my engine. i heard this car ran awesome, as did the previous one, but mazdaspeed7 had bad luck. i have a few variables, but without them all, i'm still sort of at a loss.
i have an S5, but i have an S4 intake mani i could use. i dont know if an s4 afm could be used in place of the S5 (MS7 i believe brought up the S4's superiority). i was going to half bridge it, leaving the primaries just "streetported." i have a stock ecu, but an s-afcII that'll be installed. i think thats it.
ITO, where are you ???
i have an S5, but i have an S4 intake mani i could use. i dont know if an s4 afm could be used in place of the S5 (MS7 i believe brought up the S4's superiority). i was going to half bridge it, leaving the primaries just "streetported." i have a stock ecu, but an s-afcII that'll be installed. i think thats it.
ITO, where are you ???
05-24-2004, 10:14 PM
#48
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15
oh definately, no doubt. i searched through his other threads to try and get more info. i'm not coming to a conclusion, though. i'm convinced (though i could easily be wrong) that the S4 intake manifold needs to be used and i also need to find out if the S4 AFM can plug into (or be easily spliced) an S5. i dont know if the S4 AFM is supposed to read broader than the S5, or if its the ecu (or both).
those are two of the main differences i'm worried about (though i have and intend to use the S4 intake mani unless someone reliable says "bad idea"). also, seems as though the only bridged stock ecu NAs i came across were either aux bridged or full bridged. the aux bridge sucked i believe (mazdaspeed7's) whereas ito's full was awesome. problem here is ito's was S4 full vs MS7's S5 aux (i'm at least very sure MS7's was aux only). there's too many differences between those setups that i can't reach a conclusion.
i plan to run the half, so the aux and secondaries will be bridged, meaning the intake runner will be feeding two bridgeports; not one bridge and one stock "streetported."
so, until i get some answers:
those are two of the main differences i'm worried about (though i have and intend to use the S4 intake mani unless someone reliable says "bad idea"). also, seems as though the only bridged stock ecu NAs i came across were either aux bridged or full bridged. the aux bridge sucked i believe (mazdaspeed7's) whereas ito's full was awesome. problem here is ito's was S4 full vs MS7's S5 aux (i'm at least very sure MS7's was aux only). there's too many differences between those setups that i can't reach a conclusion.
i plan to run the half, so the aux and secondaries will be bridged, meaning the intake runner will be feeding two bridgeports; not one bridge and one stock "streetported."
so, until i get some answers:
