NoPistons -Mazda Rx7 & Rx8 Rotary Forum

2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

intake pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2002, 03:23 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
sleeperRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: KAOH
Posts: 597
Default
my intake pic, pulls a lil harder after 5 grand...........l;et me know what you think about it.later
Attached Thumbnails intake pics-image003.jpg  
sleeperRX7 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-05-2002, 03:25 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
sleeperRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: KAOH
Posts: 597
Default
another pic............. :yinyang:
Attached Thumbnails intake pics-image010.jpg  
sleeperRX7 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-05-2002, 04:03 PM
  #3  
Super Moderator
 
vosko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NJ
Posts: 17,839
Default
looks good. similar to my ito spec TID
vosko is offline  
Reply
Old 06-05-2002, 09:02 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
1Revvin7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 10,906
Default
But don't the MAF on the 86-88 have to be level to work properly?

Otherwise that looks very nice.
1Revvin7 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-05-2002, 10:39 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
sleeperRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: KAOH
Posts: 597
Default
thats what i was thinking too but it works. my car is a 88 gxl and once the rpms are past 4500 it pulls a lil harder than it used too. does anyone know if i can use a 89-91 maf (mass airflow sensor)? i had to make my own adapter plate to use the cone filter and i really dont want to pay 25 bucks for the one at k2rd.com.thanks for the replies.later











pistons wish they could spin,mu ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha,ah yeah im tired as hell
sleeperRX7 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-05-2002, 11:21 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Infini IV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 243
Default
Why would you want a 89-91 AFM?? I thought the 89-91's were worse. My friend told me you can tweak something on 87-88 AFM's. He said 89-91 AFM's sucked. Anyone know if this is true or is he just lying?
Infini IV is offline  
Reply
Old 06-06-2002, 02:46 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
ILUVMY88CABRIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 3,097
Default
From what I've heard the S5 is better than the S4.
Attached Thumbnails intake pics-afmmeterconversion.jpg  
ILUVMY88CABRIO is offline  
Reply
Old 06-06-2002, 07:51 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
13BAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 7,316
Default
Originally Posted by ILUVMY88CABRIO' date='Jun 6 2002, 04:46 AM
From what I've heard the S5 is better than the S4.
That was a good find. Where did you get that picture?
13BAce is offline  
Reply
Old 06-06-2002, 03:14 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
ILUVMY88CABRIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 3,097
Default
Originally Posted by 13BAce' date='Jun 6 2002, 04:51 AM
[quote name='ILUVMY88CABRIO' date='Jun 6 2002, 04:46 AM']From what I've heard the S5 is better than the S4.
That was a good find. Where did you get that picture?[/quote]

Over at the ****-hole forum.
ILUVMY88CABRIO is offline  
Reply
Old 06-06-2002, 04:03 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
13BAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 7,316
Default
Originally Posted by ILUVMY88CABRIO' date='Jun 6 2002, 05:14 PM
[quote name='13BAce' date='Jun 6 2002, 04:51 AM'][quote name='ILUVMY88CABRIO' date='Jun 6 2002, 04:46 AM']From what I've heard the S5 is better than the S4.
That was a good find. Where did you get that picture?[/quote]

Over at the ****-hole forum. [/quote]

Man, you really hate that place, don't you?
13BAce is offline  
Reply



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: intake pics


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 PM.