2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

intake pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 5, 2002 | 03:23 PM
  #1  
sleeperRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 597
From: KAOH
Default

my intake pic, pulls a lil harder after 5 grand...........l;et me know what you think about it.later
Attached Thumbnails intake pics-image003.jpg  
Old Jun 5, 2002 | 03:25 PM
  #2  
sleeperRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 597
From: KAOH
Default

another pic............. :yinyang:
Attached Thumbnails intake pics-image010.jpg  
Old Jun 5, 2002 | 04:03 PM
  #3  
vosko's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 17,839
From: NJ
Default

looks good. similar to my ito spec TID
Old Jun 5, 2002 | 09:02 PM
  #4  
1Revvin7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 10,906
From: Peoria, AZ
Default

But don't the MAF on the 86-88 have to be level to work properly?

Otherwise that looks very nice.
Old Jun 5, 2002 | 10:39 PM
  #5  
sleeperRX7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 597
From: KAOH
Default

thats what i was thinking too but it works. my car is a 88 gxl and once the rpms are past 4500 it pulls a lil harder than it used too. does anyone know if i can use a 89-91 maf (mass airflow sensor)? i had to make my own adapter plate to use the cone filter and i really dont want to pay 25 bucks for the one at k2rd.com.thanks for the replies.later











pistons wish they could spin,mu ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha,ah yeah im tired as hell
Old Jun 5, 2002 | 11:21 PM
  #6  
Infini IV's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 243
Default

Why would you want a 89-91 AFM?? I thought the 89-91's were worse. My friend told me you can tweak something on 87-88 AFM's. He said 89-91 AFM's sucked. Anyone know if this is true or is he just lying?
Old Jun 6, 2002 | 02:46 AM
  #7  
ILUVMY88CABRIO's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,097
From: Lynnwood, WA
Default

From what I've heard the S5 is better than the S4.
Attached Thumbnails intake pics-afmmeterconversion.jpg  
Old Jun 6, 2002 | 07:51 AM
  #8  
13BAce's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,316
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ILUVMY88CABRIO' date='Jun 6 2002, 04:46 AM
From what I've heard the S5 is better than the S4.
That was a good find. Where did you get that picture?
Old Jun 6, 2002 | 03:14 PM
  #9  
ILUVMY88CABRIO's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,097
From: Lynnwood, WA
Default

Originally Posted by 13BAce' date='Jun 6 2002, 04:51 AM
[quote name='ILUVMY88CABRIO' date='Jun 6 2002, 04:46 AM']From what I've heard the S5 is better than the S4.
That was a good find. Where did you get that picture?[/quote]

Over at the ****-hole forum.
Old Jun 6, 2002 | 04:03 PM
  #10  
13BAce's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 7,316
From: Bay Area, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ILUVMY88CABRIO' date='Jun 6 2002, 05:14 PM
[quote name='13BAce' date='Jun 6 2002, 04:51 AM'][quote name='ILUVMY88CABRIO' date='Jun 6 2002, 04:46 AM']From what I've heard the S5 is better than the S4.
That was a good find. Where did you get that picture?[/quote]

Over at the ****-hole forum. [/quote]

Man, you really hate that place, don't you?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 PM.