2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

If I Had The $$

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 10:55 PM
  #11  
rx7machine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,269
From: NC
Default

Prolly put out 10mpg but the power.
10mpg.. that would suck.. but you're right 310 from an n/a would be great. :bigthumg:
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 11:06 PM
  #12  
Racer X's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,542
From: Vanderhoof,BC(Canada)
Default

Originally Posted by rx7machine' date='Jan 30 2003, 08:55 PM
Prolly put out 10mpg but the power.
10mpg.. that would suck.. but you're right 310 from an n/a would be great. :bigthumg:
just make it a weekend racer.Imagine the looks on peoples faces when they get hauled by a NA rx. :twisted:
Old Jan 30, 2003 | 11:27 PM
  #13  
rx7machine's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,269
From: NC
Default

Prolly put out 10mpg but the power.



10mpg.. that would suck.. but you're right 310 from an n/a would be great.



just make it a weekend racer.Imagine the looks on peoples faces when they get hauled by a NA rx.
Yea really.. once I fix up the FD.. time to go all out with the n/a..
Old Jan 31, 2003 | 10:10 AM
  #14  
furiousrex's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 15
From: Morristown
Default

How reliable, or lack of reliability would a 310hp N/A be. Would it be as reliable as a 13b with turbo putting out the same horse?
Old Jan 31, 2003 | 10:55 AM
  #15  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by furiousrex' date='Jan 31 2003, 08:10 AM
How reliable, or lack of reliability would a 310hp N/A be. Would it be as reliable as a 13b with turbo putting out the same horse?
basically the 310-320hp na's are what they ran in the gto class starting in 83, you could prolly get 48hours at full throttle out of it



mike
Old Jan 31, 2003 | 11:04 AM
  #16  
Rotaryman88's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,705
From: Pimp'n ain't E-Z! But driving ur FD makes it easier!
Default

Yea...don't look at having a 310HP NA motor lasting much past 35K miles of mild driving,lol...



a 310HP turbo would be more reliable...
Old Jan 31, 2003 | 11:30 AM
  #17  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

i think thats right, the turbo would last more miles on the street but the na would last longer racing.



mike
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rx7ahh
RX-7 & RX-8 For Sale
26
Jan 18, 2007 11:32 AM
???HP7
Insert BS here
10
Dec 30, 2005 05:34 PM
Shane.Trammell
RX-7 & RX-8 For Sale
1
Jun 17, 2004 11:29 AM
1Revvin7
Insert BS here
10
Nov 17, 2002 08:15 PM
1Revvin7
Insert BS here
17
Aug 1, 2002 07:03 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 PM.