2nd Generation Specific 1986-1992 Discussion

Bac Removal, Stock Ecu, 88 T2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2004, 03:11 PM
  #11  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
1988RedT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 2,532
Default

Originally Posted by Cheers!' date='Mar 14 2004, 04:07 PM
so u would rather remove the BAC, reroute the cooling lines? live with high idle instead of drilling a hole in your custom made inlet duct and epoxying a nipple on?
Nope! I be epoxy-ing!

Just wanted to make sure I had to, that's all.

I like my 750 RPM idle!
1988RedT2 is offline  
Old 03-15-2004, 10:38 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Rotaryman88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Pimp'n ain't E-Z! But driving ur FD makes it easier!
Posts: 2,705
Default

Originally Posted by Cheers!' date='Mar 14 2004, 01:49 AM
i doin't understand why people go out of their ways to remove things that make the car less user friendly. THey are there for a reason.
The reason why some people(if not most) remove those things that make the car "user friendly" are because those same things make the car not "mechanic friendly" as far as I'm concerned. When you are building an engine that isn't intended to be daily driven..and is directed more towards racing, you don't want all that emissions crap in your way everytime you have to pull something off, or replace the motor. It makes for a very clean engine bay, easy motor pulls, and as time goes on, it's one less thing that can break and have you wondering whats wrong w/ your car..the less you have under the hood, the less that can go wrong. Now, I'm not trying to tell everybody to run outside right now and rip their emissions off..it doesnt make sense to if your using your car as a fun weekend ride or daily driver...but from a racing point of view..emissions suck.
Rotaryman88 is offline  
Old 03-15-2004, 11:49 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
ColinRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,502
Default

I agree with that but anyone in that type of application I think is silly to be using a stock EFI computer for that very reason. The whole system is designed to run stock with all those components there. To 'delete' the components is just a bandaid to the real problem.



And what's so complex about a BACV anyways?
ColinRX7 is offline  
Old 03-16-2004, 12:01 AM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Cheers!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,108
Default

fair enough... so how many people race their cars more then 50% of the time legitamently?



The motorsports forum on nopistons.com doesn't get too much traffic.
Cheers! is offline  
Old 03-16-2004, 07:14 AM
  #15  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
1988RedT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 2,532
Default

Originally Posted by Cheers!' date='Mar 16 2004, 01:01 AM
fair enough... so how many people race their cars more then 50% of the time legitamently?



The motorsports forum on nopistons.com doesn't get too much traffic.
My T2 is one of six cars (okay, four running cars, a running truck, and a parts T2) that my wife and I own. The T2 gets driven to and from the strip, and around the neighborhood every weekend or two just to keep rigor mortis from setting in. This cars sole purpose is to get down the strip in a hurry. We've put less than a thousand miles on it since we got it two years ago.
1988RedT2 is offline  
Old 03-16-2004, 09:49 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
ILUVMY88CABRIO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lynnwood, WA
Posts: 3,097
Default

Getting rid of all of that **** makes working on the car so much easier. When the AE was together, I could remove the TB/UIM in less than 5 min. And like Rotaryman said it is one less thing to break.
ILUVMY88CABRIO is offline  
Old 03-18-2004, 06:19 AM
  #17  
Super Moderator
Thread Starter
 
1988RedT2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 2,532
Default

Originally Posted by ILUVMY88CABRIO' date='Mar 16 2004, 10:49 PM
Getting rid of all of that **** makes working on the car so much easier. When the AE was together, I could remove the TB/UIM in less than 5 min. And like Rotaryman said it is one less thing to break.
True enough, but as with all things, there is a point at which one should stop. Sex with a hooker is okay once in a while, but you don't want her to move in...
1988RedT2 is offline  
Old 03-18-2004, 10:29 AM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
ColinRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,502
Default

LOL. I like the analogy, and I agree 100%
ColinRX7 is offline  
Old 03-18-2004, 04:57 PM
  #19  
Member
 
UsfDr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 93
Default

I would also rid my engine of all of the emissions equipment, but the BACV is not for emissions. It doesn't require any special concern when building an engine. I will put one on everyone of my vehicles race or daily driver. The purpose of the BACV or IACV (Bypass air concrol valve or Idle air control valve) is to take filtered air and move it directly to the combustion chamber bypassing the turbo, piping, intercooler, throttle body and upper manifold.



The result is imediate air to the engine when its starving to breathe. This would occur in low idle, high load situations. Such as A/C on at idle, power steering at low speeds, braking hard at low speeds, etc...



I would run it! It does nothing but help the engine and keep it at a certain idle speed. Whats not to like about it?



UsfDr
UsfDr is offline  
Old 03-18-2004, 05:34 PM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
pengaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 2,930
Default

Originally Posted by UsfDr' date='Mar 18 2004, 10:57 PM
The purpose of the BACV or IACV (Bypass air concrol valve or Idle air control valve) is to take filtered air and move it directly to the combustion chamber bypassing the turbo, piping, intercooler, throttle body and upper manifold.
wrong, the purpose is to manage idle. It is implemented by adding a bypass of the throttle(s) that is controlled by the ECU.
pengaru is offline  


Quick Reply: Bac Removal, Stock Ecu, 88 T2



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 AM.