Originally Posted by rotary>piston' date='May 29 2003, 03:04 PM
well, just to show you that it wasn't just me that sucked: An NSX ran a best of 15.3, then ran 16.0. A 2002 CBR600F4i ran a best time of 13.0. An S5 GXL ran a 19.0, then a 19.91. A 3000GT VR-4 ran a 17.1. Many AWD Turbo DSM's ran mid to high 16's. The list goes on.....
|
Originally Posted by Apex13B' date='May 29 2003, 10:12 PM
Shitty track factor also, e-town is fast. that is how vosko got a 15.9 (he can drive too)
I stayed with chainsawonsteriods GUTTED, straight piped gxl, I launched harder, lost by 1/2 a car |
car and driver cant drag race, look at motor trends times...
|
Yea, i'm in VA and we use MD tracks...so we're close to sea level.
Never trust C&D times...they really cant drive! lol... My SE in stock form did a 17.1 at best...the NAs are 16 second cars brand new...most of these cars are aged and you need to freshen them up before they can be faster again,lol..my SE had clogged cats and a bad clutch when i ran that 17.1...when I put my straight pipe on, k&n intake and new tires...it would have pulled a 16flat or under I'm sure.... (damn SEs having 185 tires stock)... |
Originally Posted by Dramon_Killer' date='May 29 2003, 10:07 PM
Those are some messed up times. So off that it almost wants to make me call BS, but dang those are bad.
|
My 85 SE ran 15.6 at 86mph with headers/highflow cat/racingbeat muffler and a RX7.com intake. thats in Maryland.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands