Yeah, altitude does make a difference.. if you run at sea level you will be faster too.. I ran 18.5 but using the conversion to sea level posted at LACR's website the time would actually be 17.9

 

n/a's are 17 second cars?



I thought that they would run 16s stock. This is disturbing, because its lookin to be slower than my 90 Accord.

 

I think I can run the 1/4 mile faster than that....

 

NA verts are probably 17 second cars.



NA coupes should be high 15 - low/mid 16 second cars, when running strong... driver is a big variable too.

 

on the Car and Driver test of the Vert when it was new it put down an 18.1, and it says it weighs 3050 lbs..

 

yeah that weight is killing it

 

Yup plus me..

 

well, just to show you that it wasn't just me that sucked: An NSX ran a best of 15.3, then ran 16.0. A 2002 CBR600F4i ran a best time of 13.0. An S5 GXL ran a 19.0, then a 19.91. A 3000GT VR-4 ran a 17.1. Many AWD Turbo DSM's ran mid to high 16's. The list goes on.....

 

Yeah.. I was surprised to see that because of the height I lost .6 seconds.. That **** makes a big difference..

 

Shitty track factor also, e-town is fast. that is how vosko got a 15.9 (he can drive too)



I stayed with chainsawonsteriods GUTTED, straight piped gxl, I launched harder, lost by 1/2 a car