75 Repu

Yeah, altitude does make a difference.. if you run at sea level you will be faster too.. I ran 18.5 but using the conversion to sea level posted at LACR's website the time would actually be 17.9

Dramon_Killer

n/a's are 17 second cars?



I thought that they would run 16s stock. This is disturbing, because its lookin to be slower than my 90 Accord.

Nemesis

I think I can run the 1/4 mile faster than that....

pengaru

NA verts are probably 17 second cars.



NA coupes should be high 15 - low/mid 16 second cars, when running strong... driver is a big variable too.

75 Repu

on the Car and Driver test of the Vert when it was new it put down an 18.1, and it says it weighs 3050 lbs..

pengaru

yeah that weight is killing it

75 Repu

Yup plus me..

rotary>piston

well, just to show you that it wasn't just me that sucked: An NSX ran a best of 15.3, then ran 16.0. A 2002 CBR600F4i ran a best time of 13.0. An S5 GXL ran a 19.0, then a 19.91. A 3000GT VR-4 ran a 17.1. Many AWD Turbo DSM's ran mid to high 16's. The list goes on.....

75 Repu

Yeah.. I was surprised to see that because of the height I lost .6 seconds.. That **** makes a big difference..

Apex13B

Shitty track factor also, e-town is fast. that is how vosko got a 15.9 (he can drive too)



I stayed with chainsawonsteriods GUTTED, straight piped gxl, I launched harder, lost by 1/2 a car