Single Turbo Discussion Area for discussing single turbo RX-7's.

Will I Have Enough Fuel?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-2003, 10:07 PM
  #21  
IGY
Senior Member
 
IGY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Okinawa Japan at McDonalds
Posts: 472
Default

Run the 4x1680s at 42.5 psi or you will run out of pumps at about 22-23psi with the walbro's. I run 2x550 and 2x1680 2xwalbro at 62.5 psi static and have enough fuel pump to run about 23 psi. Lower fuel pressure and bigger injectors is the way to go because the pumps flow more at lower pressures. I tried the 4x1680 setup on my side ported FD and had problems because the power fc can't fire the inj at low enough duty for idle(fucked a motor because of fuel in oil contamination). With my secondary bridge I ran the 4x1680s and the idle and driveability was better than with the 850's. With 850's and 1680's with 42.5 psi static fuel pressure, I was hitting 92% at 20 psi on the bridge. These are all with a 67-1(flows very similarly to the T70 up until about 20psi).
IGY is offline  
Old 10-04-2003, 12:16 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
1Revvin7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 10,906
Default

Thxs guys.
1Revvin7 is offline  
Old 10-04-2003, 07:15 PM
  #23  
Senior Member
 
93 R1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,867
Default

Damn I think you read my mind 1revvin7. Thats almost the same damn turbo/motor setup I'm going with.
93 R1 is offline  
Old 10-04-2003, 07:17 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
93 R1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3,867
Default

Hey IGY didn't you guys experiment with wiring a 3rd set of injectors in parallel with the secondaries and running the whole damn thing with the PFC?



Did it work out? I would think that thats the way to go since you could run 850 primaries...for the smooth idle and 4x1600's for secondaries and tertiaries. That way when that T70 buries the boost gauge you have no worries about fuel.
93 R1 is offline  
Old 10-04-2003, 09:10 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
whiplash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 112
Default

9BASE3:



I can dig up some new photos... I need to post motor photos too. stay tuned.



thanks though!
whiplash is offline  
Old 10-04-2003, 11:49 PM
  #26  
IGY
Senior Member
 
IGY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Okinawa Japan at McDonalds
Posts: 472
Default

Originally Posted by 93 R1' date='Oct 5 2003, 09:17 AM
Hey IGY didn't you guys experiment with wiring a 3rd set of injectors in parallel with the secondaries and running the whole damn thing with the PFC?



Did it work out? I would think that thats the way to go since you could run 850 primaries...for the smooth idle and 4x1600's for secondaries and tertiaries. That way when that T70 buries the boost gauge you have no worries about fuel.
Actually yes, Dragon ran a six injector setup w/ 2x1680 2x550 and 2x720. It worked very well for him. If I was running 2x6an fuel lines instead of the single 8an I would have his setup on my car right now. It actually blocks off the secondary holes and you run 4 injectors in between the upper and lower intake manifold. He was hitting something like 75% at 25psi with the T70.
IGY is offline  
Old 10-05-2003, 04:40 AM
  #27  
Member
 
little rotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 65
Default

Originally Posted by IGY' date='Oct 4 2003, 08:49 PM
Actually yes, Dragon ran a six injector setup w/ 2x1680 2x550 and 2x720. It worked very well for him. If I was running 2x6an fuel lines instead of the single 8an I would have his setup on my car right now. It actually blocks off the secondary holes and you run 4 injectors in between the upper and lower intake manifold. He was hitting something like 75% at 25psi with the T70.
Why move the secondaries from their original position? Do you have any pics of the setup?
little rotor is offline  
Old 10-05-2003, 05:21 AM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
jspecracer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Okinawa, Japan
Posts: 4,928
Default

Originally Posted by little rotor' date='Oct 5 2003, 06:40 PM
Why move the secondaries from their original position? Do you have any pics of the setup?
simple. Because there's no point in running 3 fuel rails.
jspecracer7 is offline  
Old 10-05-2003, 06:17 PM
  #29  
Member
 
little rotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 65
Default

Agreed. Is there any reason not to keep the factory secondary position, add two more injectors plumbed into the primary runners between them and make a new rail?
little rotor is offline  
Old 10-05-2003, 09:02 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
1Revvin7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Peoria, AZ
Posts: 10,906
Default

Originally Posted by IGY' date='Oct 4 2003, 11:49 PM
[quote name='93 R1' date='Oct 5 2003, 09:17 AM'] Hey IGY didn't you guys experiment with wiring a 3rd set of injectors in parallel with the secondaries and running the whole damn thing with the PFC?



Did it work out? I would think that thats the way to go since you could run 850 primaries...for the smooth idle and 4x1600's for secondaries and tertiaries. That way when that T70 buries the boost gauge you have no worries about fuel.
Actually yes, Dragon ran a six injector setup w/ 2x1680 2x550 and 2x720. It worked very well for him. If I was running 2x6an fuel lines instead of the single 8an I would have his setup on my car right now. It actually blocks off the secondary holes and you run 4 injectors in between the upper and lower intake manifold. He was hitting something like 75% at 25psi with the T70. [/quote]

I like that idea, or maybe even just add a couple teritaries(sp?) injectors at the tb elbow? I forgot how many drivers my e6k will allow with already 4 high impediance injectors, but I could always add more inj drivers...
1Revvin7 is offline  


Quick Reply: Will I Have Enough Fuel?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:43 AM.