Turbo On An N/a
#21
Originally Posted by sleeper7' date='Feb 1 2004, 07:22 AM
9.4 rotors do not use as much fuel/air at a given boost # as does 8.5 rotors.
chuck
chuck
Aurosting, how about a complete run-down of your setup?
#23
Originally Posted by MazdaMike' date='Jan 30 2004, 09:35 PM
sounds awsome, u mount a fmic or u using something else for cooling?
#24
Originally Posted by 94touring' date='Jan 30 2004, 09:41 PM
I believe its the material the apex seals are made out of that isn't good for boost. Also aren't the rotors a different compression? I'd be more concerned with the apex seals breaking.
#26
Originally Posted by eddierotary' date='Jan 31 2004, 03:48 AM
man i would recomend to change those 550 injector for 680 or 720 secondary. i had my gslse engine with 4 x 550 and stock S4 turbo and it was sputtering because was running out of gas at 10 psi maibe is not the case for you. but just a recomendation
#27
Originally Posted by 1Revvin7' date='Jan 31 2004, 05:24 PM
You have an aftermarket turbo whats your point?
This is the funny part here: You have enough for 235-240rwhp safely, if using the stock ecu and stock static fuel pressure rate.
Do you know why n/a boosted engine have a bad rap? Because most people who do them do ghetto work, and almost always pop the engine shortly after
This is the funny part here: You have enough for 235-240rwhp safely, if using the stock ecu and stock static fuel pressure rate.
Do you know why n/a boosted engine have a bad rap? Because most people who do them do ghetto work, and almost always pop the engine shortly after
and am also taking precautions to avoid killing the engine
and yeah if you want call it want you want
ghetto work, amateur work, proffecional work
if it works it works
#28
Originally Posted by sleeper7' date='Feb 1 2004, 03:22 AM
http://groups.msn.com/ChucksRX7/1983rx7.ms...oto&PhotoID=104
Aurosting
check the link out. It is cheaper to make a n/a turbo then to do a turboII motor change. Nice to see others turbocharging n/a motors. 9.4 rotors do not use as much fuel/air at a given boost # as does 8.5 rotors.
chuck
Aurosting
check the link out. It is cheaper to make a n/a turbo then to do a turboII motor change. Nice to see others turbocharging n/a motors. 9.4 rotors do not use as much fuel/air at a given boost # as does 8.5 rotors.
chuck
#29
Originally Posted by mazdaspeed7' date='Feb 1 2004, 09:16 AM
Where did you get that idea? Higher compression actually raises the VE, which in turn increases the amount of air/fuel entering the chamber at any given time. Boost is entirely relative to how much air the engine is flowing. But thats still beside the point, because boost and compression ratio are completely independent of each other.
Aurosting, how about a complete run-down of your setup?
Aurosting, how about a complete run-down of your setup?
1----non-ported 6 port 1987 n/a high comp engine "9.4 compression"(seals and gasket of a t2 for safty and yes it can be done)
2----t2 intake manifold
3----msd fuel pressure regulator with boost index
4----4 t2 550cc injectors
5---- t2 fuel pump
6----t04b turbo a/r 96 p-trim
7 ----took the stock back end of a t2 turbo housing and got it bored out so the t04 fits in perfecty and got the whole turbo ceramic coeted and i also get to use the stock waste gate
8----t2 stock down pipe with cat , no secondary cat
9----single 2.5 exhust with a 4" muffer
8----stock n/a trans
9----no power steering, a/c , and pollution pump
10----20w50 oil
11----ngk b9es spark plugs
12---- 4 puck bronz racing clutch
13----hks blow off valve
14----t2 hood
15----10 psi of boost
16----atkin one peice "wha u ma cal it"(dont remember its name)
17---- thats all i can remember off the top of my mind