Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps All you could ever want to know about rebuilding and porting your rotary engine! Discussions also on Water, Alcohol, Etc. Injection

port questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-14-2006, 09:43 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Default

so ive been looking at a bunch of different engines and theres something i dont get.



the 4 port renisis engine (we changed one, leaked coolant between the irons), has small very round port runners 40mm?, but the actual port opening is HUGE (big big street port) engine makes 200ish hp, 06 is up to 212.



the cosmo 13b had GIANT port runners, and big secondary ports, but the primary ports are small. it is designed to haul around with an autmatic, in a big car.



the fd has smaller secondary ports, smallers runners, bit the primary ports are larger than the cosmo.



and then the fc motors seem to have medium sized ports and runners.



so it seems like mazda has been playing with port size/vs runner size, but its not clear why? why does the cosmo have such big runners (larger than the t2's), but smaller primary ports? i see where they want more midrange, but then why doesnt the fd share the large port runners?
j9fd3s is offline  
Old 04-14-2006, 09:07 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
fc3sboy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: watertown wisconsin
Posts: 1,331
Default

toqure curve,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, but not only did they change the intake ports they also played with the exhaust ports as well. i was told it was for toqure curve and the technolagy over the years have changed there design. also emissions was mentioned in that convo with ken from mazda japan.
fc3sboy1 is offline  
Old 04-14-2006, 09:27 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
RONIN FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Boston Ma.
Posts: 1,420
Default

The huge port in the renesis is all about timing and charge velocity. A concept i think people are missing when they port their engines.
RONIN FC is offline  
Old 04-14-2006, 10:30 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
heretic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 524
Default

The only reasoning I could ever see for the luxury car engine (Cosmo) having huge port runners, is that there were some crackheads working at Mazda at the time.



The engines were intended to be dead and buried by 6500 and use a pair of small sequential turbos for smooth turbine-like low and midrange grunt. And then they make the port runners ENORMOUS.



Crackheads. That, or they were designing by committee and nobody agreed with each other.



Did the engine have to be homologated for any home market racing series?
heretic is offline  
Old 04-15-2006, 02:06 AM
  #5  
Member
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 76
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' post='813885' date='Apr 14 2006, 09:43 AM

engine makes 200ish hp, 06 is up to 212.
The 06 auto is no longer a 4 port. It's the same 6 port as the manual with a lower redline.
rotarygod is offline  
Old 04-15-2006, 10:09 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Default

Originally Posted by rotarygod' post='814017' date='Apr 15 2006, 12:06 AM

The 06 auto is no longer a 4 port. It's the same 6 port as the manual with a lower redline.


ah, we just got the 06's in a couple weeks ago, all sticks
j9fd3s is offline  
Old 04-15-2006, 10:11 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Default

Originally Posted by fc3sboy1' post='813988' date='Apr 14 2006, 07:07 PM

toqure curve,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, but not only did they change the intake ports they also played with the exhaust ports as well. i was told it was for toqure curve and the technolagy over the years have changed there design. also emissions was mentioned in that convo with ken from mazda japan.


yeah if you look at the exhaust sleeves and the turbos, the sleeves actually direct exhaust gas AWAY from the turbos. its a wierd setup. maybe crackheads is right.
j9fd3s is offline  
Old 04-15-2006, 04:51 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
RONIN FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Boston Ma.
Posts: 1,420
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' post='814035' date='Apr 15 2006, 11:11 AM



yeah if you look at the exhaust sleeves and the turbos, the sleeves actually direct exhaust gas AWAY from the turbos. its a wierd setup. maybe crackheads is right.


My guess is there trying to induce a swirling effect. Just something else that could increase torque and midrange.



But were just speculating while the crackhead engineers did the research.
RONIN FC is offline  
Old 04-15-2006, 07:22 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
guitarjunkie28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 426
Default

Originally Posted by heretic' post='814004' date='Apr 14 2006, 08:30 PM

The only reasoning I could ever see for the luxury car engine (Cosmo) having huge port runners, is that there were some crackheads working at Mazda at the time.








big runner + small port = velocity
guitarjunkie28 is offline  
Old 04-15-2006, 08:50 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
ColinRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,502
Default

Originally Posted by RONIN FC' post='813990' date='Apr 14 2006, 10:27 PM

A concept i think people are missing when they port their engines.


Exactly..



Apply the same principle to a peripheral port. Would you have a huge port in the housing and tiny runners? Or tiny port timing in the rotor and gigantic runners? What would each do to velocity?



Some people don't realize what they are doing with their irons when they're porting. Everything needs to be taken into consideration. Port, bowl, runner diameter, runner length, runner bends, dynamic chamber (if applicable), throttle size, etc. It's all a work of art the pulse makes from the port to the atmosphere.
ColinRX7 is offline  


Quick Reply: port questions



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:22 PM.