Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps All you could ever want to know about rebuilding and porting your rotary engine! Discussions also on Water, Alcohol, Etc. Injection

Motors Blown... Got A Suprise When I Took It Apart

Old Jan 2, 2004 | 03:22 PM
  #21  
kahren's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,345
From: CT
Default

some pics of his engine
Old Jan 2, 2004 | 03:23 PM
  #22  
kahren's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,345
From: CT
Default

one more
Old Jan 2, 2004 | 03:23 PM
  #23  
kahren's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,345
From: CT
Default

one more 2
Old Jan 2, 2004 | 03:24 PM
  #24  
kahren's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,345
From: CT
Default

one more 3
Old Jan 2, 2004 | 03:24 PM
  #25  
kahren's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,345
From: CT
Default

last one
Old Jan 2, 2004 | 11:10 PM
  #26  
toddp31's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 826
From: Misawa Japan
Default

If you have ever drove or rode in a car that is BP you won't beable to say it isnt worth it.
Old Jan 3, 2004 | 03:12 AM
  #27  
boost_creep's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 502
From: Southeast
Default

The theory behind BP turbo is becoming more widely accepted, so it is only natural to have coots mouth off against doing that to rotary motors. I just did my BP turbo and will post up on the whole adventure, and thanks to BDC, he convinced me that reliability would not be a major issue.
Old Jan 3, 2004 | 03:03 PM
  #28  
BDC's Avatar
BDC
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 917
From: Grand Prairie, TX
Default

Originally Posted by boost_creep' date='Jan 3 2004, 01:12 AM
The theory behind BP turbo is becoming more widely accepted, so it is only natural to have coots mouth off against doing that to rotary motors. I just did my BP turbo and will post up on the whole adventure, and thanks to BDC, he convinced me that reliability would not be a major issue.
I was completely against it last year and the year before and refused to do it. But, after finally being convinced, I'm totally sold on it. I think there's particular ways it has to be done but it seems to be quite effective.



B
Old Jan 3, 2004 | 04:16 PM
  #29  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by BDC' date='Jan 3 2004, 01:03 PM
I was completely against it last year and the year before and refused to do it. But, after finally being convinced, I'm totally sold on it. I think there's particular ways it has to be done but it seems to be quite effective.



B
yeah i mean if you're only going for like 300hp theres no point to a bp turbo motor...
Old Jan 3, 2004 | 04:59 PM
  #30  
BDC's Avatar
BDC
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 917
From: Grand Prairie, TX
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Jan 3 2004, 02:16 PM
yeah i mean if you're only going for like 300hp theres no point to a bp turbo motor...
That's an arguable point but nonetheless valid. I would argue that it somewhat depends on the user and what they're looking for. Even though the setups I generally do are geared and intented for high 300's and above, it wouldn't be unheard to have a half-BP engine w/ a T4-sized turbo making 300rwhp. The user may want the cool idle and attention-getting of the noise and lope even though he or she isn't making gobs of power.



Practically speaking, I think you're right and I think the half BP is better designed for a turbo setup that's looking to drive a slightly larger turbocharger with higher peak HP and torque figures.



B

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 PM.