Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps All you could ever want to know about rebuilding and porting your rotary engine! Discussions also on Water, Alcohol, Etc. Injection

Independent Throttle Bodies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 08:17 PM
  #71  
mazdaspeed7's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,763
From: Savannah, Ga
Default

Originally Posted by l8t apex' date='Mar 28 2004, 10:07 PM
One year I decided to run American Sedan in SCCA. Having a small block I was reading on tunning etc. Its been 8 years but the guy (Smokey) was credited with early NASCAR/Drag engine R&D. Any way I recall it saying the V8 balance pipe in the exhaust should be approximatley 18 inches from manifold no closer than 15,(but this was not a collector)

for the scavenging effect. So would the exhaust balance pipe application do the same or do you just place the two into one collector at the optimal distance per porting and then continue single to the muffler/exit?

Also (on the intake side of things) in SCCA they wont allow any venturies connecting indidual runners or a common space in between the carb and plenum.(If I recall) Wonder if this applies because of the afore mention pulse damping

threads you and Bill S. were speaking of but why would it matter?

Thanks
A collector does the same thing as a balance pipe. V8's almost exclusively have dual exhausts, and often have h pipes or x pipes, because they are good for performance. That does the same thing as a collector as far as scavenging does. The difference is in the number of pipes going in vs out. The tuning is the same.



That being said, the only exhaust that doesnt use scavenging is the Mazdatrix true dual system for FC's. I had a custom true dual exhaust, and I hated it with a passion. Im much happier with my collected exhaust.



That does not apply to turbo motors. Exhaust tuning doesnt apply to turbo motors due to the nature of the turbo itself. The turbine section uses those pulses(as well as the gas flow) to drive the turbine, and in the process, the waves get broken up by the turbine blade. There is no distinct pulse after the turbo to be able to utilize scavenging. With a turbo, the less backpressure, the better. Thats as far as exhaust tuning after the turbo goes.
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 12:36 AM
  #72  
ColinRX7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,502
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Mar 28 2004, 01:25 PM
d jet is map based batch fired efi, same as mega squirt
Damn, looks like my GXL lost it's integrity.. It's just a crappy ripoff now..
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 10:03 AM
  #73  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by bill shurvinton' date='Mar 28 2004, 01:45 PM
So that would make haltech, wolf, SDS etc all D-jet ripoffs.



The Megasquirt is a great gift to the DIY community. Calling it a ripoff is both incorrect and somewhat offensive.
i didnt mean it that way.
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 10:05 AM
  #74  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by ColinRX7' date='Mar 28 2004, 10:36 PM
Damn, looks like my GXL lost it's integrity.. It's just a crappy ripoff now..
no its licensed
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 10:11 AM
  #75  
j9fd3s's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 22,465
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by mazdaspeed7' date='Mar 28 2004, 04:56 PM
There are many things that seem like a good idea at first, but there are very obscure reasons why it wouldnt which arent readily apparent. Often, if something hasnt been done, its not because noone has thought of it. Its because it hasnt worked, or hasnt worked well enough. Im not saying not try new things. Actually, trying new things is very important. BUT, you should always look back, and try to find reasons it hasnt been done. Try to prove to yourself that it cant be done, and if you can't do that, press on.
to some extent you can look at what mazda has done, over the years they have tried just about everything you can think of. the stuff that works for their goals, either street or race they used. the stuff that didnt work they only used the once, or it didnt even make it that far.



one example of this is the race cars of 1968, with the side and p ports they were able to get 220hp out of the 10a and go endurance racing. they never used the port style again though.
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 10:15 AM
  #76  
ColinRX7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,502
From: Canada
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Mar 29 2004, 08:05 AM
no its licensed
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 01:53 PM
  #77  
bill shurvinton's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 162
Default

Originally Posted by j9fd3s' date='Mar 29 2004, 08:03 AM
i didnt mean it that way.
So what did you mean? You have come up with a serious accusation against the work of 2 men and several thousand supporting members to provide an affordable open source EFI system. It is not licensed from bosch or 'ripped off' from bosch.
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 02:41 PM
  #78  
GMON's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 500
From: Minneapolis,MN
Default

Ok, I just read this whole thing. What a waste of my time. For all the bitching and whining going on there is no practical info I can take with me. Does anyone have dyno proof to put up of before and after for their exausts and intakes. Exactly. Even "stupid" designs hold merit untill they have been tested in the real world. Untill I see the numbers I say to all of your postulating and theorizing.



I stull luv you guys though





Gregory
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 03:15 PM
  #79  
bill shurvinton's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 162
Default

Originally Posted by GMON' date='Mar 29 2004, 12:41 PM
Ok, I just read this whole thing. What a waste of my time. For all the bitching and whining going on there is no practical info I can take with me. Does anyone have dyno proof to put up of before and after for their exausts and intakes. Exactly. Even "stupid" designs hold merit untill they have been tested in the real world. Untill I see the numbers I say to all of your postulating and theorizing.



I stull luv you guys though





Gregory
Dyno proof?



What percentage of dynos do you know that have a calibration procedure?



I certainly can't prove that my intake produces more HP than the stock setup, because I don't even know what car it originally came in. When I get plots for the new setup still wont help you as noone else will have a setup remotely like mine.



For 4cylinder engines I have a pile of dyno runs for different intake configuration, exhaust configurations and intake lengths all of the same dyno. These show clearly the effect that a well desiged inlet has on power over the an emissions optimised plenum as the car comes out the factory with. But it wouldn't help here.
Old Mar 29, 2004 | 04:14 PM
  #80  
GMON's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 500
From: Minneapolis,MN
Default

You can get close on any descent dyno. Besides if its that small of a gain its not even worth discussing.



Remember science class? Nobody will take you seriously unless THEY can reproduce YOUR results.





Gregory



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03 PM.