Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps All you could ever want to know about rebuilding and porting your rotary engine! Discussions also on Water, Alcohol, Etc. Injection

74-85 E Shaft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-2004, 08:34 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
RONIN FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Boston Ma.
Posts: 1,420
Default

I once read somewhere that the old 13b e shafts are stronger than the 86-91 shafts

Any truth to this?
RONIN FC is offline  
Old 06-12-2004, 09:54 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
ColinRX7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,502
Default

I've heard this quite a few times as well...
ColinRX7 is offline  
Old 06-12-2004, 11:10 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Default

i dunno, but it also doesnt have the f*$&%&#ng thermopellet, so right there its better
j9fd3s is offline  
Old 06-12-2004, 12:51 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Jeff20B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,284
Default

As far as strength, I don't know, but I'd rather use the old style.
Jeff20B is offline  
Old 06-12-2004, 01:34 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
rowtareh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbia IL/St. Louis MO
Posts: 2,748
Default

What is the thermopellet? Would'nt a TII e-shaft or FD e-shaft be stronger since it was "newer" than the 79-85 shafts?
rowtareh is offline  
Old 06-12-2004, 01:45 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Jeff20B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,284
Default

I don't know about the FD shaft, but the FC shaft had that stupid oil pellet garbage in it which means it needed to be machined to hold it. That means less material in the shaft which means less strength.



Then again, I've never heard of the front of a shaft breaking. It's always the rear of the shaft that breaks. Maybe it's because of the larger circumference of the flywheel? Perhaps an auto counterweight would put less stress on the shaft because the imbalance is closer to the centerline of the shaft. Remember that the stock flywheels have the imbalance at the outer edge near the starter ring gear.
Jeff20B is offline  
Old 06-12-2004, 01:49 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
rowtareh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbia IL/St. Louis MO
Posts: 2,748
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff20B' date='Jun 12 2004, 02:45 PM
I don't know about the FD shaft, but the FC shaft had that stupid oil pellet garbage in it which means it needed to be machined to hold it. That means less material in the shaft which means less strength.



Then again, I've never heard of the front of a shaft breaking. It's always the rear of the shaft that breaks. Maybe it's because of the larger circumference of the flywheel? Perhaps an auto counterweight would put less stress on the shaft because the imbalance is closer to the centerline of the shaft. Remember that the stock flywheels have the imbalance at the outer edge near the starter ring gear.
Oh, I see. Any way I can change over the FB shaft in the future? Or would it not really be worth it?
rowtareh is offline  
Old 06-12-2004, 02:18 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Jeff20B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,284
Default

Probably not. If you were needing to buy a new one, then yes.
Jeff20B is offline  
Old 06-16-2004, 05:54 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: I don't really exist ...
Posts: 500
Default

i think i remember reading somewhere (either in a book, magazine or on another forum) that there are no appreciable differences in the eccentric shafts in terms of strength. however, just for the sake of the thermal pellet, and the minor pain of having to seek an alternative plug for it, many people prefer using the older ones.
diabolical1 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chase78
Rotary Engine Building, Porting & Swaps
4
09-16-2005 02:33 PM
NicksRx
2nd Generation Specific
3
06-10-2002 04:58 PM
rxseven
2nd Generation Specific
3
05-19-2002 05:51 PM
Seppuku
2nd Generation Specific
7
05-19-2002 12:03 PM
Slackware
1st Generation Specific
5
08-29-2001 11:42 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: 74-85 E Shaft



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 AM.