Other Cars Non-rotary powered car discussion.

Powertec Rpa V8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2004, 04:33 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Shane.Trammell's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Richardson Texas
Posts: 4,326
Default

383 hp at how many rpms? 10k? just use a rotary
Shane.Trammell is offline  
Old 12-29-2004, 02:30 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Bluemeaniews6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 113
Default

Originally Posted by inanimate_object' date='Dec 28 2004, 04:35 AM
It produces plenty of torque for a 2.whatever litre engine. It's just because it's producing an insane amount of horsepower that the torque levels don't seem to match.



Mark



Yeah, for a 2 liter engine, but at the same time look at where the rev has to be to reach that torque. You are better off with an aluminum block 4 cylinder.
Bluemeaniews6 is offline  
Old 12-29-2004, 05:13 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
inanimate_object's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 907
Default

Originally Posted by Bluemeaniews6' date='Dec 29 2004, 09:29 AM
Yeah, for a 2 liter engine, but at the same time look at where the rev has to be to reach that torque. You are better off with an aluminum block 4 cylinder.

It's hourses for courses, my car only produces 75lb ft of torque, and thats at something like 7500rpm - but it's plenty for the car since it's light. In fact it has more torque/tonne than an new v8 range rover. Regardless, this RPA v8 will produce well over twice that with a far nicer spread in cars that don't weigh a whole lot than mine - I guarantee you nobody is going to be complaining about torque. And that engine star



As for the 4 cyl engine being better, I can't think of any 2.6 litre engines that produce anywhere close to 380bhp without forced induction, and as for the torque comment, I take it you haven't seen this:





Mark
inanimate_object is offline  
Old 12-29-2004, 11:47 AM
  #14  
MPM
Senior Member
 
MPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 158
Default

Put that engine in a Lotus 7 clone that weighs 1300# and you'll smile every time you hit the go pedal. Bad part is the engine will cost more than the rest of the car. An awesome track car that you can carry a passenger in.



http://www.championmotorcars.com/
MPM is offline  
Old 12-29-2004, 03:35 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Bluemeaniews6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 113
Default

That 2.6 wasn't N/A so why should the 4 cylinder have to be N/A?
Bluemeaniews6 is offline  
Old 12-29-2004, 05:47 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
inanimate_object's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 907
Default

Originally Posted by Bluemeaniews6' date='Dec 29 2004, 10:35 PM
That 2.6 wasn't N/A so why should the 4 cylinder have to be N/A?

Check again.



Mark
inanimate_object is offline  
Old 12-29-2004, 05:51 PM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
inanimate_object's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 907
Default

Come to think of it, what kind of horsepower would that thing make if it did have a set of turbos on there? The hayabusa heads are good for 500bhp each



Mark
inanimate_object is offline  
Old 12-30-2004, 02:11 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
defprun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,016
Default

sweet ****** engines id put one in my toyota paseo!
defprun is offline  
Old 01-02-2005, 08:15 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
inanimate_object's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ireland
Posts: 907
Default

Originally Posted by MPM' date='Dec 29 2004, 06:46 PM
Put that engine in a Lotus 7 clone that weighs 1300# and you'll smile every time you hit the go pedal. Bad part is the engine will cost more than the rest of the car. An awesome track car that you can carry a passenger in.



http://www.championmotorcars.com/

http://www.rst-v8.com/ - Here's a similar idea using 2 Yamaha R1 engines using 2 crankshafts, no idea how the gearbox would work - the website doesn't say anything about what they use, from the video's on the site it looks like a standard non-sequential gearbox.



The only other v8 from 2 bike engines I can think of is one developed by Quantum http://www.cyclonepowerltd.co.uk/products.htm



The Radical engine looks far more competent engine than either of these though.



Mark
inanimate_object is offline  
Old 01-03-2005, 11:25 AM
  #20  
Senior Member
 
DJ Rotor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: teh frozen nort
Posts: 1,030
Default

There's also the Drysdale engines. http://home.mira.net/~iwd/



I want that Radical engine. That's the closest you'll get to an F1 engine for the road.
DJ Rotor is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:08 AM.