Other Cars Non-rotary powered car discussion.

The Lotus Exige 240 Is Gay

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 22, 2005 | 06:11 PM
  #11  
inanimate_object's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 907
From: Ireland
Default

Very nice. Not much left in common with a standard one.



Mark
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 12:20 AM
  #12  
driftfc4fun's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 10
From: Glens Falls NY
Default

is it me...or is it missing pedals?





must be fly by wire!!!!



Gee do ya think I would fit in it?



6'6 240lbs.
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 05:22 AM
  #13  
sweet7's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,430
From: Stacked outside you're trailer door
Default

[quote name='driftfc4fun' date='Jul 22 2005, 09:20 PM']is it me...or is it missing pedals?

must be fly by wire!!!!



Gee do ya think I would fit in it?



6'6 240lbs.

[snapback]741758[/snapback]

[/quote]



Sure. Just make sure the first accessories you buy for it are a chainsaw and crowbar
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 11:11 AM
  #14  
rfreeman27's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,107
From: fredneck MD
Default

The pedals are there. They aer mounted from above.





And i would also think with that much of a staggered wheel setup there would be a huge understeering problem, but there are other ways to get around that...
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 12:38 PM
  #15  
inanimate_object's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 907
From: Ireland
Default

Mid-emgined cars, and especially ones that light don't need wide front wheels.



Mark
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 12:40 PM
  #16  
djgiantrobot's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,019
Default

the staggered setup is because the motor is in the back, you always want wider wheels under the heavier section of car in racing. Rear engine wider rear tires...like a formula car. In those pics you can tell the car isn't quite completed, looks to be missing a pedal and some of the cable linkage to the rear isn't connected
Old Jul 23, 2005 | 01:12 PM
  #17  
CletusFD3S's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 742
Default

[quote name='rfreeman27' date='Jul 23 2005, 10:11 AM']

And i would also think with that much of a staggered wheel setup there would be a huge understeering problem, but there are other ways to get around that...

[snapback]741835[/snapback]

[/quote]

got boost?
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 04:47 PM
  #18  
93 R1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,867
From: Maryland
Default

[quote name='BrandonDrecksage' date='Jul 22 2005, 06:41 PM']the staggered withd of the wheels is because of the extreme power. it'll make the car oversteer less because the rear wheels will have a bigger contact patch..of vice versa...the front wheel will loose traction first and cause understeer because of the smaller contact patch. basically...to probably keep a neutral handling feel.

[snapback]741644[/snapback]

[/quote]





[quote name='rfreeman27' date='Jul 23 2005, 12:11 PM']And i would also think with that much of a staggered wheel setup there would be a huge understeering problem, but there are other ways to get around that...

[snapback]741835[/snapback]

[/quote]





[quote name='inanimate_object' date='Jul 23 2005, 01:38 PM']Mid-emgined cars, and especially ones that light don't need wide front wheels.



Mark

[snapback]741863[/snapback]

[/quote]





[quote name='djgiantrobot' date='Jul 23 2005, 01:40 PM']the staggered setup is because the motor is in the back, you always want wider wheels under the heavier section of car in racing. Rear engine wider rear tires...like a formula car.
[snapback]741865[/snapback]

[/quote]



I understand staggered wheel setups. I was refering to the 8.8" width and 11.25" width. Why not just go to a 9" in the front and a 11.5" out back? Why the wierd *** widths?
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 05:57 PM
  #19  
donhayes's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 485
From: El Paso, TX
Default

cause they can, and i want one. If only i was rich. but im not and thats why i drive an fc
Old Jul 24, 2005 | 07:04 PM
  #20  
BrandonDrecksage's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 792
From: green brook, nj
Default

[quote name='93 R1' date='Jul 24 2005, 04:47 PM']I understand staggered wheel setups. I was refering to the 8.8" width and 11.25" width. Why not just go to a 9" in the front and a 11.5" out back? Why the wierd *** widths?

[snapback]742186[/snapback]

[/quote]





european measurements are different then american i'd guess?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 PM.