Bugatti Veyron
#21
Originally Posted by 75 Repu' date='Apr 28 2004, 08:51 AM
a car like that cannot be compared to another car just because it will be as fast on the 1/4.. the other car with a built up engine will be runnin at redline trying to keep up,. the driver will be hangin on for dear life.. hoping that nothing goes wrong as he goes down the track.. the Bugatti driver will stomp the gas pedal and go down in a straight line.. while probably lookin in the rearview mirror fixing his damn Neck tie.. while he is doin that he will notice the souped up lil car trying to keep up...
why buy a $30k Ducati when a Hayabusa is faster.. Because it rides $14k nicer..
a finer car will go to high speeds.. but feel like it is not movin..
why buy a $30k Ducati when a Hayabusa is faster.. Because it rides $14k nicer..
a finer car will go to high speeds.. but feel like it is not movin..
#29
The Veyron is nice, but I'd rather have The EB110SS.. whoever the **** posted that pic... So basically.. with an extra 400 horsepower.. the Veyron pulls to 60 in what.. 3 seconds? When the EB110 did it in about 3.6-3.8... Not trying to nitpick, I mean both cars accelerate like their strapped to an aircraft carrier deck, but my .02 says gimme the EB110SS
#30
I am starting to wonder whether the Veyron will ever make it to production, the car made it's debut in geneva 6 years ago if my memory serves correct, we were supoposed to have it last year, and now they are saying we are going to have to wait another 18 months for a car that is unlikely to break 1000bhp, let alone the 1200bhp we were promised.
As far as I'm concerned I'm glad this is happening to VW (I say VW because I have a soft spot for Bugatti), because the McClaren F1 is far to good to be beaten by a quad-turbo, heavy, 4wd, hp-queen.
Mark
As far as I'm concerned I'm glad this is happening to VW (I say VW because I have a soft spot for Bugatti), because the McClaren F1 is far to good to be beaten by a quad-turbo, heavy, 4wd, hp-queen.
Mark