Northwest Anything that pertains to Northwest owners.

Some big changes for me

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-2006, 01:16 AM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
rmriggin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 519
Default

Found this image on Mariah Motorsports website

rmriggin is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 01:32 AM
  #32  
Senior Member
 
rmriggin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 519
Default

Damn it, I had more to add! Too late to edit now!



Another interesting site

http://www.vortechsuperchargers.com/products/



As far as keeping temps down centrifugal seems to be the most flexible and easiest to intercool. Also the centrifugal type would seem to be a perfect fit for a rotary because bost increases as RPM increases.



If getting this thing running before ABF is the plan. AND you want to stay supercharged I think that going with the centrifugal type is going to give better results than a Camden. I think install and fabrication would be easier also.

This is just my .02

Trying to help/give ideas.



Keep us informed (I am sure you will!).
rmriggin is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 03:26 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
CorkSport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 581
Default

Supercharger, turbocharger, whaaaaatever.



You name it and we'll stick it on there
CorkSport is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 04:53 PM
  #34  
Member
 
1987_GXL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 95
Default

Originally Posted by CorkSport' post='798692' date='Feb 1 2006, 01:26 PM
Supercharger, turbocharger, whaaaaatever.



You name it and we'll stick it on there


do both!!! super-tubro charged!!
1987_GXL is offline  
Old 02-01-2006, 10:50 PM
  #35  
Junior Member
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 16
Default

Yikes, I think you'll want to do a little more research first. A centrifugal supercharger will feel just like a turbo, actually a bit more 'laggy', a turbo would be a MUCH better idea than a centrifugal. The whipple is a twin-screw positive displacement, it'll have 'instant' boost just like the Camden, except the efficiency will be EXTREMELY better. However, the downside is nobody makes a kit for any twin-screw chargers, and everything must be fabricated (estimate a total cost of around $5k or so including the charger for a Whipple, though with a power output capable of around 350rwhp depending upon the charger). You could possibly locate a Millenia S twin-screw and throw that on with a little fabrication (Similar to what 88IntegraLS did on his 2nd gen), those should be good for about 300 to the wheels, just requires fabrication sadly. There is some work going on with Axial superchargers again, but mostly for the RX8.
SonicRaT is offline  
Old 02-02-2006, 06:17 AM
  #36  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
CODE BLUE 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Guess its Spokeompton... USA...
Posts: 597
Default

Originally Posted by SonicRaT' post='798834' date='Feb 1 2006, 08:50 PM

Yikes, I think you'll want to do a little more research first. A centrifugal supercharger will feel just like a turbo, actually a bit more 'laggy', a turbo would be a MUCH better idea than a centrifugal. The whipple is a twin-screw positive displacement, it'll have 'instant' boost just like the Camden, except the efficiency will be EXTREMELY better. However, the downside is nobody makes a kit for any twin-screw chargers, and everything must be fabricated (estimate a total cost of around $5k or so including the charger for a Whipple, though with a power output capable of around 350rwhp depending upon the charger). You could possibly locate a Millenia S twin-screw and throw that on with a little fabrication (Similar to what 88IntegraLS did on his 2nd gen), those should be good for about 300 to the wheels, just requires fabrication sadly. There is some work going on with Axial superchargers again, but mostly for the RX8.


See now you got me changing my mind again. Out of everyone I do trust your judgement as you have always been upfront and honest with me, even when I hated what you said at times . Even though I do want to keep the car supercharged, the smartest thing for me to do to make things easier on myself is just go with the norm. (turbo), its less hassle modding everything all over again, and cheaper.



I'm hoping someone likes Camden Superchargers and will buy my blower for a cheap price so I can get started on a new project. I don't think scraping it will get me close to what I paid for it in the first place
CODE BLUE 2 is offline  
Old 02-02-2006, 09:05 AM
  #37  
Junior Member
 
SonicRaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 16
Default

Yeah, that's the severe downside to supercharged rx7's right now, they're great when you've got a decent charger and it's done properly, but the Camden unit itself isn't very efficient, so it leaves a TON to be desired, and nobody really makes a bolt on kit for any twin-screws, so it's hard to have a nice positive displacement setup short of paying someone a lot to fabricate it for you or doing it yourself. The centrifugal chargers are a fair bit easier to install, as all that's required is some brackets and rerouting intake ducting, the only problem with them though is they build boost progressively, so there's not much low end being added, which is why a turbo is usually easier and better since you'll probably have more low end and top end than trying to fit one on. They really benefit vehicles where a turbo application doesn't have a whole lot of room to work with. Wish I could say do this and do that and have you with a twin-screw because I know you'd laugh your *** off at the Camden unit once you drove in one and could keep the car supercharged, but at the moment it's not a very feasable task unless your a machinist. Haha, yeah, it seems people hate what I say a lot of times, but sooner or later I end up right, most of the time!
SonicRaT is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FC_RX7
1st Generation F.A.Q.'s
7
06-18-2006 01:34 PM
Fd3BOOST
Insert BS here
4
02-26-2003 11:15 AM
gmonsen
3rd Generation Specific
10
11-17-2002 02:32 PM
phinsup
Insert BS here
5
04-26-2002 09:02 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Some big changes for me



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44 AM.