What To Use Instead Of Deoderant
01-26-2005, 08:39 PM
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ummm, Oregon
Posts: 504
yea baby powder kicks ***. oh and put toothpast under your arms and squeeze your pits tightly, then make a back and forth mothion like you are running. might burn a lot but gets rid of smells. and skin.
01-26-2005, 09:04 PM
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,850
Originally Posted by TheRiseOfTheFerret' date='Jan 26 2005, 07:58 PM
Well, supposedly I'm gay, so dont listen to me. Anti-Persperant is actually better than deodorant. Anti-persp., blocks off the sweat glands in your pits and has fragrance added to it. So it not only stops the **** that causes the smell, it covers it up to. Deodorant just covers it up, it still allows the sweat glands in your pits to release sweat and smell. But as I said I'm really really really gay so dont listen to me.
Isnt that weird, Im gay supposedly, but I'm engaged to a girl.
Isnt that weird, Im gay supposedly, but I'm engaged to a girl.
anti persperant has a chemical in it that causes cancer in lab rats. Its a aluminum oxide or something close to that, deodorant doesn't have that chemical. what it does is stops the sweat glands like you said, but hey cancer is a worthy side effect !
01-26-2005, 09:26 PM
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 464
well, I've been using anti persperant for years and I don't have cancer. I doubt seriously that you could ever find a case where anti persperant was a direct cause of cancer, so I'm not gonna worry about it.
keep in mind, these same people told us that eggs could cause cancer. I quit listening when they said that.
keep in mind, these same people told us that eggs could cause cancer. I quit listening when they said that.
01-26-2005, 09:29 PM
#28
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: NY
Posts: 403
Originally Posted by Rob x-7' date='Jan 26 2005, 09:11 PM
it was done out of desperation. I am not used to smelling bad.
01-26-2005, 09:33 PM
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 464
Originally Posted by nopistons93' date='Jan 26 2005, 07:27 PM
its very hard to directly link something to cancer. even smoking theres no DIRECT proof that it causes cancer, i mean its obvious that it does, but i don't think theres evidence that directly links it to cancer is there ?
In my theory, people lived for millions of years without even knowing what the hell cancer was, and now the whole world practically revolves around it. I really don't give a ****. I'm gonna do what I'm gonna do, and not let myself get stressed out over worring about cancer.
and, why the hell do the test rats? what good does that do? its a whole different species. I'm not extremely knowlegeable about medical stuff, but that makes no sense on any level.
consider this, i can have a cold and sneeze right in my dogs face, but he's not going to catch a cold. Why? because he is a different species. Viruses and bacteria and chemicals affect him differently. The testing on rats is the same thing. What effects them may not effect us.
01-26-2005, 09:35 PM
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,850
dude i think the exact same way. I mean what in the 1800s people live till like 50 -60 latest . i mean people are living to 80 now but big deal i mean science and medicine is like 44264262424 times better now and people are still dying and only living a little bit older than back in the day. I mean sure people die a lot less of simple diseases sure, but i get what your saying