Insert BS here A place to discuss anything you want!

What Do You Think Of Land Rover?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 26, 2004 | 08:27 PM
  #11  
boxrs4sale's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 682
From: Delaware
Default

Originally Posted by Turbo II' date='May 26 2004, 01:07 PM
they have a lot of problems. my brothers in laws have gone through a couple already. its more of a baller status than a reliable suv
i agree
Old May 26, 2004 | 09:28 PM
  #12  
1gendreemer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 354
From: PA
Default

Yeah I've known some folks that had horror story repairs one em....sick trucks though and stylin as hell.
Old May 26, 2004 | 09:55 PM
  #13  
FDRacing's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 141
From: Cedarville, New Jersey
Default

as a parts guy i can tell ya they are expensive on parts
Old May 27, 2004 | 07:19 AM
  #14  
93 R1's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,867
From: Maryland
Default

Get something like I have
Old May 29, 2004 | 12:52 PM
  #15  
inanimate_object's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 907
From: Ireland
Default

Personally I don't understand the huge craze for 4x4's - so you sit a little higher, but anything over 60mph is painful, mid-teen mileage, the ride is terrible at best, and the whole "extra girth = extra safety" idea is a farce. If you really need the space get an estate.



Both Land Rovers and Range Rovers are designed for offroad use (and in fairness they're the best at what they do, but if you're not going to need this ability, there are better options out there.



Mark
Old May 29, 2004 | 02:16 PM
  #16  
phinsup's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 24,416
From: Stuart, FL
Default

I've always loved Land Rover's, they are on the top of my list of rigs to get when I have money, however I've known a few people that have had them, seems they either last forever or are problematic, I dunno. I had a friend that worked at Microsoft and he was on his 3rd engine in under 70k and the guy drove like old people ****, my buddy in AZ beats the crap out of his and I don't even know if changes the oil.



I guess just be prepared to do some work on it when you buy it, parts are a little more expensive, but they aren't insane.
Old May 29, 2004 | 04:21 PM
  #17  
inanimate_object's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 907
From: Ireland
Default

Sorry about the previous post, I reread it and was a little OTT , anyway I happened on an interesting article re. my girth = safety comment: http://www.bridger.us/2002/12/16/CrashTest...ooperVsFordF150 If your interested in how most European cars fare in crash testing do a google on Euro NCAP.



Mark
Old May 29, 2004 | 04:48 PM
  #18  
phinsup's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 24,416
From: Stuart, FL
Default

BMW's are certainly ahead of the game when it comes to collision
Old May 30, 2004 | 10:07 AM
  #19  
miltstheman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 153
From: The fine state of Denial...
Default

As little as possible.
Old May 30, 2004 | 11:11 AM
  #20  
TYSON's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,871
From: London, Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by inanimate_object' date='May 29 2004, 05:21 PM
Sorry about the previous post, I reread it and was a little OTT , anyway I happened on an interesting article re. my girth = safety comment: http://www.bridger.us/2002/12/16/CrashTest...ooperVsFordF150 If your interested in how most European cars fare in crash testing do a google on Euro NCAP.



Mark
One of the cable channels showed a comparo of full size trucks with extended cabs. I think they figured the Toyota was safest in the end?



Those 3rd and 4th door extended cabs like shown in that picture are a real problem. As you can see, they take out the post immediately behind the driver which destroys the integrity of the cab. Since most of that was done mid-run, the cab isn't properly designed for crash impact.





Get an H1!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:31 PM.