View Poll Results: The War On Iraq
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll
The War On Iraq
03-24-2003, 12:14 AM
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Wayne, NJ
Posts: 4,837
I think bush put it best when he said something to the liking of:
Instead of protesting war use your time better and clean up pollution, or help the needy, or whatever.
when i read his statement on cnn (mine is the abridged version lol, definitely not verbatim) i almost keeled over laughing because it's sooooo true.
kevin.
Instead of protesting war use your time better and clean up pollution, or help the needy, or whatever.
when i read his statement on cnn (mine is the abridged version lol, definitely not verbatim) i almost keeled over laughing because it's sooooo true.
kevin.
03-24-2003, 04:17 AM
#74
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,342
Originally Posted by sandmans7' date='Mar 23 2003, 11:18 PM
The worst is that damn disgusting bastard, in our army that threw the grenade that killed an officer and injured some of our troops. He should have been shot by firing squad as it states in the UCMJ.
Vic
Vic
Death firing squad is cool---If I get to be one of them........
If they bring him back to the STATES for trial I will fricking LOSE IT!
Bullet in the head, hanging(not used anymore), bullet in the back of
the head. Any of the above would be suitable for him.
Chemical factory---I dont think it will be *****. The UN will eat their words
im sure. BUT I dont think how we will end seeing thats jackass(SADDAM) use
them. Im sure he wants to go out with a bang. Granted US forces had some
trouble today, maybe getting to relaxed... OUR!!!!!!!!!!! Armed forces ROCK! I have without a doubt we will take SADDAM down. I have a bad feeling though like he is going to let them all come in to BAGDAD and one big boobie trap will go off. I PRAY (even though Im not religious) (even though I believe their is a god) That, this DOES NOT HAPPEN!
I just we find them, before he can use them........
03-24-2003, 04:25 AM
#75
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,342
Originally Posted by 89 Rag' date='Mar 23 2003, 02:05 PM
[quote name='JT-Imports' date='Mar 23 2003, 01:53 PM'] The one and only thing I dont get. It why was there close to no PROTESTORS for the AFGHAN war, but we are doing the same thing in IRAQ now and everyone is complaining? I just dont get that one.
I mean AFGHAN isnt awesome now, but at least they have a chance to turn it into something now.
I mean AFGHAN isnt awesome now, but at least they have a chance to turn it into something now.
I love the war coverage with the "embeded" journalists.
What a wonderful addition to a squad leaders detail, as if there aren't enough variables to work with, he has to stuff the press under a tank or have them driven 10 miles to the rear incase of a firefight. "Johnson, watch the rookie, he keeps standing behind the Javelin, keep an eye on him or next time we'll have to pick him up with a spatchula! [/quote]
True true.....
BUSH better not give up on that focker....
Since the war is taking most of the coverage, it seems like they are
waiting for him to surface in a tactical sceem (wrong spelling) If you look
close between the lines, you can see some small info in other lands where
they are still hunting him. I hope the US is going for the double boobie trap
and gets them both.....
03-24-2003, 09:41 AM
#76
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 1,788
The ***** thing about all this is how many people from allied forces have died in this war without even being in combat, ie "blue on blue", "friendly fire". I mean WTF? Explain that to the parents/familys of those poor guys/girls. I know its not completely unavoidable, but I thought we all could have learnt some lessons from WW2 and Gulf War 1. There was like a third of US casualties in GW1 was from B on B. Thats seriously ghey. 
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)