USPS Needs a Bail Out
03-25-2009, 06:48 PM
#1
Administrator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stuart, FL
Posts: 24,416
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...cle=1&catnum=0
Call for Help: Postal chief says agency crashing
Mar 25 01:35 PM US/Eastern
WASHINGTON (AP) - The financially strapped U.S. Postal Service will run out of money this year without help from Congress, Postmaster General John Potter warned on Wednesday.
"We are facing losses of historic proportion. Our situation is critical," Potter told a House subcommittee.
The agency lost $2.8 billion last year and is looking at much larger losses this year said Potter, who is seeking congressional permission to reduce mail delivery from six days to five days a week.
Potter also urged changes in how it pre-pays for retiree health care to cut its annual costs by $2 billion.
If the Postal Service does run out of money, the lingering question, Potter told the House Oversight post office subcommittee, is which bills will get paid and which will not.
He said ensuring the payment of workers' salaries comes first, but other bills may have to wait.
Potter first raised the possibility of delivery cutbacks in January, but the idea has not been warmly received in Congress.
"With the Postal Service facing budget shortfalls the subcommittee will consider a number of options to restore financial stability and examine ways for the Postal Service to continue to operate without cutting services," subcommittee chairman Stephen F. Lynch, D-Mass., said.
Lynch said the financial stability of the Postal Service is "critical to the American expectation of affordable six-day mail delivery."
Even if the agency succeeds in reaching its planned cost cuts of $5.9 billion, there could still be a $6 billion deficit in 2010, Potter said.
"Without a change we will exhaust our cash resources," Potter said. "We can no longer afford business as usual." He estimated that delivering mail five days-a-week instead of six would save $3.5 billion per year.
Asked if layoffs would occur, Potter said it is possible, but he hopes avoidable.
Last week, the post office said it planned to offer early retirement to 150,000 workers and is eliminating 1,400 management positions and closing six of its 80 district offices across the country in cost-cutting efforts. Potter said he expects 10,000 to 15,000 workers to accept the early retirement offer.
Dan Blair, head of the independent Postal Regulatory Commission, suggested that other savings are possible through closing small and rural post offices—something Congress has resisted in the past. He added that it may be necessary to increase the limit on the amount of debt the post office can carry.
The post office had a $384 million loss in the first quarter of the fiscal year—October through December—which is usually the busiest period because of the holidays.
Officials said the recession has contributed to a mail volume drop of 5.2 billion pieces compared to the same period last year. If there is no economic recovery, the USPS projects volume for the year will be down by 12 billion to 15 billion pieces of mail.
Over the past year the post office says it has cut 50 million work hours, stopped construction of new facilities, frozen salaries for executives, began selling unused facilities and has cut post office hours.
Last year's high fuel prices also sapped funds from the post office, which operates more than 200,000 vehicles. Every one-cent increase in the price of fuel costs the post office $8 million.
Blair also noted that Congress could consider appropriating money to help the post office. Currently the agency does not receive a taxpayer subsidy for its operations, although Congress does subsidize overseas voting and free mail for the blind.
William Young, president of the National Association of Letter Carriers, stressed in his testimony that the agency is not seeking a taxpayer bailout, "but we are here to ask the Congress for help."
"At this moment, the survival of the Postal Service—a venerable institution that is literally older than our country—hangs in the balance," Young added.
Lawmakers also raised questions regarding recent news reports which said Potter is paid as much as $800,000-a-year.
That is not correct, Potter said. He said his salary, set by Congress, is $263,575. He said the news reports were also counting his retirement fund, the cost of his security detail and a $135,000 bonus which would be paid over 10 years after he retires. The bonus is based on improved delivery rates and customer satisfaction, he said. Under the current financial conditions, Potter said, he would not be eligible for a bonus this year. Carolyn Gallagher, chairwoman of the postal governing board, said postal executives are paid only a fraction of what executives in similarly sized businesses receive.
Call for Help: Postal chief says agency crashing
Mar 25 01:35 PM US/Eastern
WASHINGTON (AP) - The financially strapped U.S. Postal Service will run out of money this year without help from Congress, Postmaster General John Potter warned on Wednesday.
"We are facing losses of historic proportion. Our situation is critical," Potter told a House subcommittee.
The agency lost $2.8 billion last year and is looking at much larger losses this year said Potter, who is seeking congressional permission to reduce mail delivery from six days to five days a week.
Potter also urged changes in how it pre-pays for retiree health care to cut its annual costs by $2 billion.
If the Postal Service does run out of money, the lingering question, Potter told the House Oversight post office subcommittee, is which bills will get paid and which will not.
He said ensuring the payment of workers' salaries comes first, but other bills may have to wait.
Potter first raised the possibility of delivery cutbacks in January, but the idea has not been warmly received in Congress.
"With the Postal Service facing budget shortfalls the subcommittee will consider a number of options to restore financial stability and examine ways for the Postal Service to continue to operate without cutting services," subcommittee chairman Stephen F. Lynch, D-Mass., said.
Lynch said the financial stability of the Postal Service is "critical to the American expectation of affordable six-day mail delivery."
Even if the agency succeeds in reaching its planned cost cuts of $5.9 billion, there could still be a $6 billion deficit in 2010, Potter said.
"Without a change we will exhaust our cash resources," Potter said. "We can no longer afford business as usual." He estimated that delivering mail five days-a-week instead of six would save $3.5 billion per year.
Asked if layoffs would occur, Potter said it is possible, but he hopes avoidable.
Last week, the post office said it planned to offer early retirement to 150,000 workers and is eliminating 1,400 management positions and closing six of its 80 district offices across the country in cost-cutting efforts. Potter said he expects 10,000 to 15,000 workers to accept the early retirement offer.
Dan Blair, head of the independent Postal Regulatory Commission, suggested that other savings are possible through closing small and rural post offices—something Congress has resisted in the past. He added that it may be necessary to increase the limit on the amount of debt the post office can carry.
The post office had a $384 million loss in the first quarter of the fiscal year—October through December—which is usually the busiest period because of the holidays.
Officials said the recession has contributed to a mail volume drop of 5.2 billion pieces compared to the same period last year. If there is no economic recovery, the USPS projects volume for the year will be down by 12 billion to 15 billion pieces of mail.
Over the past year the post office says it has cut 50 million work hours, stopped construction of new facilities, frozen salaries for executives, began selling unused facilities and has cut post office hours.
Last year's high fuel prices also sapped funds from the post office, which operates more than 200,000 vehicles. Every one-cent increase in the price of fuel costs the post office $8 million.
Blair also noted that Congress could consider appropriating money to help the post office. Currently the agency does not receive a taxpayer subsidy for its operations, although Congress does subsidize overseas voting and free mail for the blind.
William Young, president of the National Association of Letter Carriers, stressed in his testimony that the agency is not seeking a taxpayer bailout, "but we are here to ask the Congress for help."
"At this moment, the survival of the Postal Service—a venerable institution that is literally older than our country—hangs in the balance," Young added.
Lawmakers also raised questions regarding recent news reports which said Potter is paid as much as $800,000-a-year.
That is not correct, Potter said. He said his salary, set by Congress, is $263,575. He said the news reports were also counting his retirement fund, the cost of his security detail and a $135,000 bonus which would be paid over 10 years after he retires. The bonus is based on improved delivery rates and customer satisfaction, he said. Under the current financial conditions, Potter said, he would not be eligible for a bonus this year. Carolyn Gallagher, chairwoman of the postal governing board, said postal executives are paid only a fraction of what executives in similarly sized businesses receive.
03-26-2009, 09:31 AM
#5
Administrator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stuart, FL
Posts: 24,416
Originally Posted by Baldy' post='919152' date='Mar 26 2009, 08:47 AM
UPS/DHL/FedEx do great with packages, why can't they do letters on the cheap?
LOL, USPS cant do letters on the cheap either they are going broke.
USPS goes to EVERY house delivering at least something for the trashcan every day, ups goes to maybe 2 houses on the block and only delivering packages that are worth at least $8 each.
03-26-2009, 09:47 AM
#7
Administrator
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stuart, FL
Posts: 24,416
Originally Posted by jwteknix' post='919162' date='Mar 26 2009, 10:45 AM
well who actually uses snail mail aside from billers and advertisers?
That's my point, why do we need mail 6 days a week, the only thing i use the mail for is netflix, most of my bills are electronic and paperless. Monday, Wednesday and Friday mal delivery would fine and maybe we could cut the price down on stamps. There's a reason no private business has started delivering mail... there's no money in it.
03-26-2009, 11:58 AM
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: California
Posts: 22,465
Originally Posted by phinsup' post='919163' date='Mar 26 2009, 07:47 AM
That's my point, why do we need mail 6 days a week, the only thing i use the mail for is netflix, most of my bills are electronic and paperless. Monday, Wednesday and Friday mal delivery would fine and maybe we could cut the price down on stamps. There's a reason no private business has started delivering mail... there's no money in it.
i use it to ship ebay stuff, cause its cheap and it works. that being said even mail 1-2 days a week would be fine, hell even once a month.
there isn't supposed to be money in the mail, thats why the govt does it, just like there is not really supposed to be money in making sidewalks, but loosing billions of dollars is like not right either
