Turbo Busa

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

04-14-2004, 12:01 AM

#21

boxrs4sale

Senior Member

Join Date: Jul 2003

Location: Delaware

Posts: 682

insane.. reckless and insane.. but none the less.. i want one too

04-14-2004, 12:23 AM

#22

4RotorRocket

Senior Member

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 1,882

wow amazing!

that guys a ****** nutcase

04-14-2004, 12:50 AM

#23

Srce

Senior Member

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 5,547

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cheers!' date='Apr 13 2004, 11:52 PM

http://www.super7cars.com/introduction.htm

Nice, can you say autocross killer?

04-14-2004, 09:29 AM

#24

FlukeSDS

Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2004

Location: Montreal, Quebec

Posts: 623

I don't know if you guys have seen these before but if you think those super 7's are crazy ... Check This Out ...

Also, here's another Turbo 'Busa, it's pretty sick also. Hope you haven't seen this either lol ... Turbo 'Busa Movie

The 'Busa movie is pretty big (about 20mb) so I'm sorry all dial up users lol.

Take Care,

Shaun

04-14-2004, 09:56 AM

#25

Travisty

Senior Member

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 331

take a turbo busa motor and drop it into one of those super 7' AWD models.

if it did a 0-60 in 2.8 with 380hp how about with fatter tires and a 550hp turbo motor?

that would be fun.

04-14-2004, 03:25 PM

#26

inanimate_object

Senior Member

Join Date: Nov 2003

Location: Ireland

Posts: 907

Quote:

Originally Posted by Travisty' date='Apr 14 2004, 03:56 PM

take a turbo busa motor and drop it into one of those super 7' AWD models.

if it did a 0-60 in 2.8 with 380hp how about with fatter tires and a 550hp turbo motor?

that would be fun.

Like this?: http://www.daxcars.co.uk/rush/reviews/index.htm You're far better off with just RWD, there are no traction problems with Bike Engine Cars (due to the low torque) and more importantly, no AWD = saves weight

. The Dax 7type is also a much better developed/handling car than the tiger.

Also, Z-cars did an even madder twin-engine tiger (not on their site) with twin zx12 engines

- even had aerodynamic gear (the only real problem with 7esque cars is that they are about as aerodynamic as a brick).

Mark

04-14-2004, 05:31 PM

#27

Cheers!

Senior Member

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 3,108

meh, i'll design it myself. The only problem comes when u want reverse, that is going to require al ot of work and $$$ unless u buy premade

04-15-2004, 09:48 AM

#28

FlukeSDS

Senior Member

Join Date: Apr 2004

Location: Montreal, Quebec

Posts: 623

Quote:

Originally Posted by inanimate_object' date='Apr 14 2004, 12:25 PM

Also, Z-cars did an even madder twin-engine tiger (not on their site) with twin zx12 engines

I posted a link to that car before lol. No one reads my posts

.

But seriously that car is sick. One engine for the front wheels, another for the rear. Two separate transmissions that can be shifted together or separately. 0 - 60 in 2.8 secs. It's just sick. I got a video of it somewhere I'll try and dig it up

.

Next Time Read My Post! lol just kidding.

Shaun

04-15-2004, 01:54 PM

#29

inanimate_object

Senior Member

Join Date: Nov 2003

Location: Ireland

Posts: 907

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cheers!' date='Apr 14 2004, 11:31 PM

meh, i'll design it myself. The only problem comes when u want reverse, that is going to require al ot of work and $$$ unless u buy premade

Reverse is not a huge problem, it's solved using a motor which lowers onto a cog between the prop shaft and the diff (or the gearbox in some cases), simple enough to make out of a starter motor and a motorcycle brake disc with grooves cut in it. Or you could just push the thing - it's certainly light enough.

Mark