insane.. reckless and insane.. but none the less.. i want one too

 

wow amazing!



that guys a ****** nutcase

 

Nice, can you say autocross killer?

 

I don't know if you guys have seen these before but if you think those super 7's are crazy ... Check This Out ...



Also, here's another Turbo 'Busa, it's pretty sick also. Hope you haven't seen this either lol ... Turbo 'Busa Movie



The 'Busa movie is pretty big (about 20mb) so I'm sorry all dial up users lol.



Take Care,

Shaun

 

take a turbo busa motor and drop it into one of those super 7' AWD models.

if it did a 0-60 in 2.8 with 380hp how about with fatter tires and a 550hp turbo motor?

that would be fun.

 

Like this?: http://www.daxcars.co.uk/rush/reviews/index.htm You're far better off with just RWD, there are no traction problems with Bike Engine Cars (due to the low torque) and more importantly, no AWD = saves weight . The Dax 7type is also a much better developed/handling car than the tiger.



Also, Z-cars did an even madder twin-engine tiger (not on their site) with twin zx12 engines - even had aerodynamic gear (the only real problem with 7esque cars is that they are about as aerodynamic as a brick).



Mark

 

meh, i'll design it myself. The only problem comes when u want reverse, that is going to require al ot of work and $$$ unless u buy premade

 

I posted a link to that car before lol. No one reads my posts .



But seriously that car is sick. One engine for the front wheels, another for the rear. Two separate transmissions that can be shifted together or separately. 0 - 60 in 2.8 secs. It's just sick. I got a video of it somewhere I'll try and dig it up .





Next Time Read My Post! lol just kidding.



Shaun

 

Reverse is not a huge problem, it's solved using a motor which lowers onto a cog between the prop shaft and the diff (or the gearbox in some cases), simple enough to make out of a starter motor and a motorcycle brake disc with grooves cut in it. Or you could just push the thing - it's certainly light enough.



Mark